Laserfiche WebLink
t,�1 Ot4'N rye. <br /> Town of l✓ <br /> 16 C r eat,sec k �oacl,Mwl h <br /> ml� ' <br /> Mashpee, Massachuscas 02649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> Decision for a Variance <br /> RE: David Hufnagel 58 Monomoscoy Rd. West <br /> Owner of Record: James Kalweit Map 114 Parcel 95 <br /> V-06-67 <br /> A Petition was filed on August 22, 2006 for a Variance from the setback <br /> requirements and landspace requirements from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws in <br /> order to raze and replace existing dwelling with a three bedroom house on property <br /> located in an R-3 zoning district at 58 Monomoscoy Road West (Map 114 Parcel 95) <br /> Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, <br /> a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on August 25, 2006 and <br /> September 1, 2006, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, September 13, 2006 continued to October 25, 2006, continued to December <br /> 13, 2006 and continued to January 10, 2007, at which time the following members of the <br /> Zoning Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Robert Nelson, Zella <br /> Elizenberry, Marshall Brem, Frederick Borgeson and Jonathan Furbush. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Section 10 and the Town of <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Alexander Watt, Esq.,along with Jack Landers-Cauley represent Mr. Hufilagel. <br /> This matter was originally heard on September 13, 2006 continued to October 25, 2006, <br /> then to December 13, 2006 and then January 10, 2007 whereby the applicant seeks to <br /> raze and replace existing dwelling with a new three bedroom dwelling. There were many <br /> continuances due to concerns from the DPW, Fire Department and plans needing to be <br /> re-drawn depicting said requests. The Board had asked for applicant to satisfy all <br /> requests from the Fire Department and the DPW with respect to signs on the roads and <br /> widening the street for access by emergency vehicles. Mr. Nelson reads into the record <br />