Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning <br />Board of Appeals Carlos Nasciemento <br />2 SP-06-74 <br />f <br />Perry of 6 Autumn Drive. They feel strongly that the proposed garage is too close to the <br />side line for a lot just over 10,000 square feet. They discuss the parking dangers since the <br />existing driveway is such a steep hill and feel a two car garage is too over -powering for <br />the lot and the neighborhood. They discuss other areas to put the garage however, Mr. <br />LaLiberte mentions there is the septic system to consider. They discuss going to a one <br />car garage however this is not what his customer is looking for. The Board tends to agree <br />with the abutters and is also not happy with the parking situation. After much discussion <br />regarding parking and lack thereof, the Mr. Nelson asks for a vote. Zella Elizenberry <br />wishes to abstain from the voting. Robert Nelson denies the both motions. Jonathan <br />Furbush denies both motions. Frederick Borgeson denies both motions. Marshall Brem <br />denies both motions. This is all denied without prejudice. Reference plans from J.E. <br />Landers Cauley of West Falmouth, MA, dated August 28, 2006, Job No. 1650. <br />GENERAL FINDINGS <br />1. that the subject lot is located at 15 Attaquin Street and contains 10,560 square <br />feet. <br />SPECIAL PERMIT CRITERIA <br />§ 174-45.4 of the Zoning By-laws states: <br />"Conversion of an existing dwelling to accommodate not more than two (2) families, <br />provided that there is not external evidence of occupancy by more than one (1) family, <br />and further provided that each dwelling unit resulting from such conversion shall have <br />not less than three hundred (300) square feet of habitable floor space" <br />SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br />The Board determined that: <br />I . Applicant did not meet the requirements to grant the special permit <br />requested. <br />In view of the foregoing, the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals found that the <br />applicant did not meet the criteria necessary for the granting of a Special Permit. Upon <br />motion duly made and seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 4-1 to deny the <br />special permit. <br />