My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/08/2005 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
06/08/2005 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2022 12:00:20 PM
Creation date
2/9/2022 11:54:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning <br />Board of Appeals Minutes <br />4 6-8-05 <br />• Chervl Eastwood: Requests a Special Permit from Sections 174-20 and 174-45.4 of the <br />zoning by-laws in order to raze and replace a structure, to add a detached accessory <br />apartment and to exceed the requirements of maximum square footage for an accessory <br />dwelling on property located in an R-5 zoning district at 87 Hoophole Road (Map 57 <br />Parcel 46) Mashpee, MA. <br />Sitting: Robert Nelson, Zella Elizenberry, Evano Cunha, Jonathan Furbush and Eric <br />Dublirer. <br />Attorney Brian Garner of Dunning and Kirrane represents the applicant at this hearing. <br />They are seeking a special permit to build a detached accessory apartment. The Board <br />reviews the plans and realizes that although the parcel of land in question is 3.81 acres, <br />the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing shack and build a new house <br />containing more than 4,000 square feet and a detached DWELLING containing more <br />than 2,000 square feet. Attorney Garner gives some history on the application. The <br />existing dwelling the applicant is proposing to tear down is less than 1,000 square feet <br />and is truly a shack. The proposed dwelling will conform to all setback requirements <br />although the lot remains non -conforming due to its lack of frontage on Hoophole Road. <br />The new septic system will be an improvement to the neighborhood and the house will be <br />setback farther from the wetlands thus conforming to zoning for that by-law as well. The <br />accessory "apartment" is for the applicants parents who, without their financial, input, the <br />project could not be accomplished. Ms. Rogers wants her parents to live on the same <br />• property and feels they have plenty of land to do it. Attorney Garner states that the Board <br />has granted two other detached accessory apartment permits in the recent past and feels <br />the same should be afforded to his client. The proposed main dwelling will contain two <br />stories within the allowable height restrictions and the accessory dwelling will be one <br />story. The parcel under consideration is a lot resulting from a subdivision and subsequent <br />gift by the prior owner of a 32 acre conservation grant to the Town as set out in an ANR <br />Plan dated December 1, 1971 and recorded in Plan Book 256, Page 89. The by-law for <br />an accessory apartment permits the addition to a principal dwelling unit so long as it is <br />occupied by the actual property owner and secondary and incidental to the principal use <br />of the owner's home. The Board may permit such relief provided they find the new <br />dwellings will not be more substantially detrimental to the neighborhood that what <br />currently exists now. The ZBA granted relief in 1998 to demolish and rebuild the <br />proposed structure (or similar to the proposed structure). The permit expired before the <br />applicant was able to proceed due to circumstances beyond their control. The Board also <br />addressed the requirements of Section 174-145 by finding an conditioning that relief on <br />the basis that the road be maintained at minimal standards of impervious surface, and a <br />minimum width of 14 feet and a minimum vertical clearance of 13 % feet. <br />Notwithstanding that construction never took place, the applicant has continued to <br />maintain those standards until the present time and agrees to continue to do so if this <br />permit is granted. The proposed structure would also be moved back from the Wetland <br />Resource Area and will greatly exceed applicable front and rear -yard setbacks. A new <br />Title V septic system will greatly enhance the antiquated system currently existing there <br />• now. <br />Mr. Borgeson asks Attorney Garner and Ms. Rogers (now speaking at this point as well) <br />why this is not in the planning board to be subdivided. Ms. Rogers informs the Board <br />_711414- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.