Laserfiche WebLink
Oct-25-00 11 :09A <br /> �zwm <br /> Town ofWashpee <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 16 ( reatNeck �&oad,Ndorai <br /> .�*► Insl�tpee, lYla,tisachtcsE?ttS 0:' 649 <br /> AUIPETITION FOR A VARIANCE <br /> Under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 10 <br /> and Mashpee Zoning By-laws <br /> To: Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals Date: December 19 , 2003 <br /> The undersigned Petitions the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals to vary, in the manner <br /> and for the reasons hereinafter set forth, the application of the provisions of the Zoning By-laws <br /> to the following described premises: <br /> Applicant: Robert L. Bateman, III 14 Jessica Way, E. Falmouth, MA 02536 <br /> (Full name) (Address) (Telephone #) <br /> Property Owner: Robert L. Bateman, III, 14 Jessica Way, E. Falmouth, MA 02536 <br /> (Full name) (Address) (Telephone 0) <br /> Location of Property: 3 Mohegan Avenue T <br /> (House Number and Name of Street) (Subdivision Name) <br /> Assessor's Map/Block Number: Map 9: 72 Block 9: _ 72 <br /> Dimensions of Lot: 100, 125 Area <br /> (Frontage) (Depth) (Square Feet) <br /> Zoning District in which premises are located: R-3 <br /> Eli <br /> What is current use of the property? ^_ Vacant land U'D —' <br /> How long have you owned premises? 2 & 1 2 years <br /> How many buildings are now on the lot? n/n <br /> Give size of existing buildings: Proposed buildings ___ _,, <br /> State proposed use of premises: Single family residence <br /> Section <br /> What section(s) of the Zoning By-laws do you ask to be varied? 174-31 <br /> State reasons for Variance: Applicant acquired several non—conforming lots which <br /> have been combined to create a large non—conforming lot which happened to be <br /> Have you submitted plans for above to the Building Department? <br /> Has permit been refused? <br /> Hearing Date set for: <br /> ( pplicant's Signature) evin M. Kirrane, Esquire <br /> *separately owned until he acquired it. He assumed that because it was buildable <br /> when he acquired it, that it would continue to be buildable. However , due to the fact <br /> that he had previously acquired another adjacent non—conforming lot , the Building <br /> Inspector has informed him that he has lost the protected status. <br />