My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/28/2004 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
04/28/2004 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 5:03:35 PM
Creation date
2/10/2022 12:58:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/28/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Jonathan Yohannan 2 <br /> Board of Appeals V-04-64 <br /> lot. The topography features establish where the ACEC is and that is what the client is <br /> seeking relief from. They would be willing to maintain the 50' buffer from the BVW if <br /> they can obtain relief and build within 25 feet of the ACEC. Mr. Sanicki also informs the <br /> i <br /> Board that on June 1 Oth they received approval from Conservation Commission. <br /> Marshall Brem makes a motion to grant the variance as requested. <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> 1. that the subject property is located at 304 Redbrook Road and contains 1.59 <br /> acres. <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would <br /> involve hardship to the petitioner. <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> 1. that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography that affect <br /> the subject lot and not the district in which it is located. <br /> 2. that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the <br /> Petitioner. <br /> 3. that relief may be granted without detriment to the public good. <br /> 4. that relief may be granted without derogating from the intent or purpose of the <br /> By-laws. <br /> 5. that the subject property is impacted by wetlands. <br /> 6. that the Board determined that without relief the lot could not be used for a <br /> residence,the purpose for which it had been laid out and for which the <br /> balance of the undersized lots in the subdivision were being used. <br /> 7. that the lot has been maintained as a separate buildable lot on the Assessor's <br /> Records and is subject to betterments from the Water District. <br /> 8. that a new septic system would be an improvement to the property. <br /> i <br /> I: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.