Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals Minutes <br /> 3 November 10, 2004 <br /> on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 111 Shore Drive (Map 117 Parcel 335) <br /> Mashpee, MA. <br /> Sitting: James Regan, Robert Nelson, Zella Elizenberry, Marshall Brem and Richard <br /> Guerrera. <br /> John Slavinsky of Cape & Islands Engineering, represent the petitioner at this hearing. <br /> He is seeking to have an accessory apartment in the basement of the house they in the <br /> middle of building. The apartment will have an exterior stairway and will be open and <br /> have parking in the front. The Technical Review Committee has approved this as well. <br /> It will be owner occupied and not be given in perpetuity. The height of the entire new <br /> dwelling will be 29.10 feet. Marshall Brem moves to grant the special permit. Zella <br /> Elizenberry seconds the motion. All agree. So moved. <br /> Wayne MacKinnon: Requests a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws <br /> to seek relief from the current setback requirements and landspace requirements in order <br /> to build a new dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 17 Cross Street <br /> Map 128 Parcel 21) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Wayne MacKinnon: Requests a Special Permit from Section 174-20 of the Zoning By- <br /> law's to demolish the existing dwelling and rebuild a new dwelling on property located in <br /> an R-3 zoning district at 17 Cross Street Map 128 Parcel 21) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Sitting: (James Regan steps down from this hearing) Robert Nelson, Zella Elizenberry, <br /> • Marshall Brem, Richard Guerrera and Frederick Borgeson. <br /> John Slavinky of Cape & Islands Engineering represents the petitioner in this matter. <br /> They are seeking a variance and a special permit in order to tear down the existing <br /> dwelling and rebuild a new dwelling, larger in size and therefore a variance is necessary <br /> for setback relief and landspace requirements. Mr. Slavinsky explains to the Board that <br /> petitioner's land consists of 2 parcels; one containing 6,000 square feet and another <br /> which has Rock Landing Road running through it, contains 3,000 square feet and is <br /> refered to as a"buffer zone". These parcels are registered in land court as such and <br /> petitioner has designed a house using a total of 9,000 square feet as the total size of the <br /> lot and still keeping the lot coverage under 20% (at 17.6%) The houses currently on <br /> Rock Landing Road all line up together at a certain distance from the Road and petitioner <br /> contends to keep that the same. The Board may use the average setback rule if they deem <br /> it appropriate and not have petitioner go back to the 40 feet currently required by the <br /> Mashpee By-laws. Mr. MacKinnon's property line does in fact extend through Rock <br /> Landing Road, a road traveled by all residents that live in Rock Landing Park. Mr. <br /> MaaKinnon is also being taxes on a 9,000 square foot lot and contends that it is his right <br /> to use that fact that he has "9,000" although admittedly, all of that is not buildable. The <br /> neighbors vary greatly in their opinions of this matter. The following people have spoken <br /> out against Mr. MacKinnon using a total 9,000 square feet as his total lot size. <br /> Mr. Peter Reidel <br />