Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning Minutes—May 22, 2002 g <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> Attorney Richard Z. Minassian represented the Petition and was accompanied by <br /> Attorney Thomas Souza from Carter and Associates. Attorney Minassian stated that the j <br /> property located at 1 Sunset Circle was purchased in 1965 and developed. The other <br /> property located at 5 Sunset was purchased in 1970 and remains vacant. The properties <br /> were purchased in the name of the husband and wife, Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Hegarty, Jr. <br /> In 1989 both properties were conveyed to Mrs. Hegarty and sons, Brian D., Paul J., <br /> Thomas P., Mark S. and John F. Hegarty. The property located at 5 Sunset Circle has <br /> been taxed as buildable since its original <br /> purchase 1 in 1970. <br /> g p In a letter dated November <br /> 19, 2001, Building Commissioner Wheeler informed Mr. Joseph Hegarty that he had <br /> determined to deny issuance of a building permit on the property located at 5 Sunset <br /> Circle because it was currently held in `contiguous ownership' with the property located <br /> at 1 Sunset Circle. <br /> I i! <br /> Mr. Govoni said that the By-law regarding contiguously owned lots was changed in <br /> 1985. He said that he used the state law, Chapter 40A section 6 t <br /> P o allow owners <br /> grandfathering protection, as long as ownership was changed within the five-year period <br /> from 1/1/85 to 1/1/90. <br /> No comments were received <br /> from abutters. <br /> Mr. Borgeson moved to determine that the property located at 5 Sunset Circle is a <br /> separate and buildable lot, due to the fact that the Petitioner separated ownership of the <br /> subject property within the five-year period from 1/1/85 to 1/1/90. Mr. Borgeson moved <br /> to determine that the subject property does not need a Variance from the lot size <br /> requirements. The decision is subject to payment of all taxes due on the subject property. <br /> Ms. Elizenberry seconded. All agreed. <br /> Chapman, Cole & Gleason Funeral Homes—Request a Modification to a Special Permit, <br /> SP-01-29, under Sections 174-25.E.6., 174-39, 174-51.B. and 174-82.A.4. of the Zoning i' <br /> By-laws for permission to add caretaker's quarters to the following: a mortuary, <br /> undertaking or funeral establishment, signage exceeding 20 square feet and parking <br /> spaces exceeding the minimum required within the Groundwater Protection District on <br /> properties located in a C-2 zoning district at 68 and 74 Algonquin Avenue (Map 72 <br /> Parcels 114 and 115) Mashpee, MA. Continued from April 24, 2002 to allow for <br /> Planning Board comments. <br /> Sitting: Edward M. Govoni, Richard T. Guerrera and Zella E. Elizenberr . <br /> Y <br /> A memo dated May 2, 2002 from Planning Board regarding the Petition states the <br /> following: <br /> "The Planning Board unanimously moved to recommend that the Zoning Board <br /> of Appeals DENY this Special Permit Modification request. The rationale for this <br /> recommendation is that this proposed use is ILLEGAL under the current zoning <br /> with the Town of Mashpee. The only circumstance in which the Zoning By-law <br /> allows a `caretaker residence' is specifically for self-storage facilities, which are <br />