Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee <br /> S 16 Great Yeck Pgad Jforth <br /> . ��y MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL <br /> HIE ashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Decision for a Variance <br /> RE: Peter C. & Elizabeth M. Maher V-02-72 85 Bluff Avenue <br /> Map 118 Parcel 59 <br /> A Petition was filed on May 21, 2002 by Peter C. & Elizabeth M. Maher of <br /> Woburn, Massachusetts for a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws I <br /> to vary the front setback requirements to allow for construction of a single-family home <br /> on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 85 Bluff Avenue (Map 118 Parcel 59) <br /> Mashpee, MA. <br /> I <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a <br /> newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on June 7, and June 14, 2002, <br /> a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> u ! <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at which time the following members of the Zoning Board of <br /> Appeals were present and acting throughout: Edward M. Govoni, Robert G. Nelson and <br /> Richard T. Guerrera. Mr. Regan stepped down and left the room. <br /> Ii <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Section 10 and the Town of <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. j <br /> Mr. David Sanicki <br /> of Cape & Islands Engineering represented I <br /> p g g sented p the Petition and <br /> submitted photos of the subject property. Plans call for demolition of the existing home, j <br /> which is currently 19.5 feet from the property line. Construction of the new family home <br /> on the property would be 20 feet from the property line, which would be less detrimental <br /> than the existing dwelling. Mr. Sanicki stated that construction and placement of the <br /> I; <br /> septic system,y m, which was configured in compliance with Title V requirements, restricts <br /> the location of the proposed home. There is no need for a Variance from lot coverage <br /> requirements. <br /> I I' <br /> I li <br /> Ms. Shirley Boutilier, whose mother owns the abutting property at 81 Bluff <br /> Avenue, stated that she `loves the plan' and indicated that she would not object to the <br /> proposal. No other comments were received from abutters. I ! 1 <br /> Ii <br /> 1l <br /> I <br /> I <br /> �I <br /> I <br /> it <br /> I� <br />