09/25/2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions

Home Browse Search

a, Mashpee Zoning Constance Lally SP-02-107 2 Board of Appeals I SPECIAL PERMIT CRITERIA Section 174-25.I.9 states that the Board must find that the structure will not B unduly interfere with the free passage of travel by water or land or cause or contribute ' x4} to the substantial disruption or degradation of the marine or coastal environment. �I : t� SPECIFIC FINDINGS 1. that the proposed dock will be an accessory to an existing dwelling and is a s permissible use upon the grant of a Special Permit. 2. that the Shellfish Constable, whose responsibilities include protection of the marine environment, has approved the proposal. 3. that the proposal has been reviewed by the Conservation Commission to l address impacts on the coastal environment. 4. that the use is in harmon with the general y Y g purpose and intent of the By-laws. 5. that the owner has rights to maintenance in perpetuity. that filing with the Corps of Engineers shall be considered execution of the Special Permit In view of the foregoing, the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals found that the ? applicant met the criteria necessary for the granting of a Special Permit. Upon motion f duly made and seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously on September 1 25, 2002 to grant the Special Permit. The Special Permit is conditioned upon compliance with proposed plans by Pesce Engineering &Associates, P.O. Box 321, Osterville, MA Job#52912, dated July 21, 2002. 1 II; I I I I ' i }