01/12/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—January 12, 2000 6 Board of Appeals �a Mr. Dan Prunty of Canterbury Builders represented the applicants and submitted photosN of the existing home. He stated that the proposed addition of a sunroom and a garage to ti's an existing home would help meet the needs of the applicants' growing family. No extra t bedrooms are proposed. Mr. Prunty stated that approximately 550 square feet would be k,;I added to the existing 1800-square foot home and that no Variance relief from the front or k rear setback requirements is needed. No comments were received from abutters. Mr. Regan moved to grant a Variance of 2.5 feet from the easterly side of the subject lot and a Variance of 6.4 feet from the westerly side of the subject lot, subject to criteria 2, 3, 4 and findings 1. Mr. Govoni seconded. All agreed. Merry Meadow Enterprises, Inc. Sitting: Edward M. Govoni, James E. Regan III and Robert G.Nelson. A Petition was filed on February 17, 1998 by Merry Meadow Enterprises Inc. for a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the lot size and frontage requirements on property located in a C-2 zoning district at 22 Falmouth Road(Map 55 Block 8)Mashpee, M.A. Upon motion duly made and seconded,the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously , on March 25, 1998 to grant a variance of 12 feet to allow for a sideline variance of 8 feet on the Northeast side. The Variance is conditioned upon compliance with Plan 1117997 w by Cape & Islands Engineering. On October 13, 1999, Merry Meadow Enterprises, Inc. filed a Petition for a Minor �w; Modification to the above-referenced Variance. ; Upon motion duly made and seconded,the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously l� on October 13, 1999 to grant the Minor Modification to the Variance V-98-23. On January 5, 2000, the applicant requested a modification of the above-referenced Variance,V-98-23. The Modification includes the following improvements: 1. extend the left side of cooler line an additional 8 x 4 feet. 2. extend mansard roof across entire length of the front of the building. w� Jt Mr. Keith Gay represented the applicant who would like to extend the cooler and the mansard roof for a more aesthetically pleasing look to the building. Mr. Hauck , confirmed that the eight-foot proposed addition and the extension of the mansard roof amount to a minor modification. The Board determined that the request is a minor modification to the ori g inal VarianceV-98-23. 1 T i i r"