My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/26/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
01/26/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2022 10:27:50 AM
Creation date
2/22/2022 10:25:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/26/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OPPOSITION TO PETYMN FOR VARIAIVCL (CASE,NO.V-00-32) <br /> CANAL AUTO BODY <br /> 64 ALG>ONQi1INA`'ENUE.I4LaS1 Y'lta:t: �I <br /> § 174-31 Land Space Requirements Table <br /> Argument No. 1: The subject lot is in a C-2 Business Zoning District. The rrinirnutn lot <br /> frontage required is 200.00 feet. The subject lot haq 150.00 feet of frontage, <br /> w1hich is only 755'of the requirement. <br /> I. <br /> i' <br /> 174-31)RvN.:ired Nur ber of Spaces _ _ - _. -- <br /> Axguinert No. 2: The subject lot is in a C-2 Business Zoning District. The proposed.principal ill, <br /> use of the subject lot is retail services(automobile repair shop). <br /> �f <br /> Tbe Zotuizg By-Law fegcures one parLJ ag space of ea6h 150 feet of gross i <br /> c ri tl SzwPhar. w lu reg u r S3 ark>r s.acres. The Site Flan ?rov des._ <br /> floc area. The .o osw d 8.000' spare-foot retail sen.'ic e lnuldin p as shown — <br /> only 2:5 parkutg space;,,which is only 4; cf the off-street p rking <br /> requirem- <br /> ents for a lot in a C-2 Business Zonirig Disrtriet. <br /> The Applicant is asking the Board to regard his use of the subject lot as <br /> "indlastrial"for purposes of complying wadi the off-street parking <br /> requirements of the By-Law. We note that"industrial"is not a permitted <br /> use in a C-2 Susi ess Zoning District,therefore the higher,not the lower, <br /> standard for parking requircinents should be applied. <br /> As the subject site is essentially surrounded by R-3 and R-5 Residence <br /> Zoning Districts,it is our position that the minimum parking requirerrlents of <br /> a C-2 Business Zoning District should not be further diluted by granting a <br /> variance. <br /> Additionally,the Site Plan does not provide sufficient detail to show that the <br /> parking spaces,as depicted,comply with the requirements of§ 174.38 Size <br /> and Dimension of Spaces, as far as width and hnei(exclusive of driveways <br /> and maneuvering space)and total area of any paxking facility for more than <br /> hive cars(exclusive of driveways). <br /> S� •I d gZ NV 00 <br /> f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.