Laserfiche WebLink
Town o Mash ee <br /> t ARD OF APPEALS <br /> y16 Great Xeck &ad Arth <br /> DIE Decision for a Variance Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 �) <br /> i ' <br /> RE: Kenneth& Gail Anderson, Trs. 195 Ashers Path West-Map 52 Block 39 <br /> V-00-27 203 Ashers Path West-Map 60 Block 42 I' <br /> A Petition was filed on December 28, 1999 by Kenneth& Gail Anderson, <br /> Trustees, of Mashpee, Massachusetts for a Variance from Sections 174-31 and 174-32 Ir <br /> of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the lot size requirements, to combine two <br /> lots into one buildable lot and to allow for construction of a single-family dwelling on an <br /> unpaved road on properties located in an R-5 zoning district at 195 and 203 Ashers Path <br /> West(Map 52 Block 39 and Map 60 Block 42)Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a <br /> newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on January 7 and January 14, <br /> 2000, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> � I <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, January 26, 2000, at which time the following members of the Zoning <br /> �I <br /> Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Edward M. Govoni, James E. <br /> Regan III and Robert G. Nelson. ± �� <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 40A, Section 10 and the Town of <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Attorney Jeremy Carter represented the applicants and stated that they have <br /> owned the subject lots since 1963. The lots are larger than adjacent lots in the area and <br /> both lots meet the frontage requirements. Attorney Carter stated that Ashers Path West is <br /> a 40-foot wide unpaved road. Building Inspector Russell Wheeler confirmed that the <br /> road is wide and that other lots have been developed on the road. <br /> An abutter, Lewis H. Atkins, sent a letter to the Board in opposition to the j <br /> ' proposals. Mr. Atkins failed to specify the nature of his opposition. <br /> Ms. Shirley Nurse Peters, an abutter, stated that the unpaved road does not pose a <br /> travel problem. She said that her lot and the subject lots are the largest lots in the area <br /> f <br /> 'I <br />