Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 16 Great Veck load Xorth <br /> I <br /> �y <br /> Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Decision for a Variance P <br /> RE: Pauline A. Hicks V-00-39 10 Hicks Way <br /> Map 44 Block 47 <br /> A Petition was filed on January 10, 2000 by Pauline A. Hicks of Mashpee, III j <br /> Massachusetts for a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for permission I'll <br /> to vary the lot space requirements on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 10 <br /> Hicks Way(Map 44 Block 47) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, <br /> a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on February 4 and <br /> February 11, 2000, a copy of which is attached hereto and made aparthereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> i <br /> Wednesday, February 23, 2000, at which time the following members of the Zoning <br /> i <br /> Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Edward M. Govoni, Zella E. '! <br /> Elizenberry and Frederick R. Borgeson. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 40A, Section 10 and the Town of <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. !' <br /> Mrs. Pauline A. Hicks represented her application and was accompanied by (' <br /> �I Ii <br /> r <br /> several family members. Mrs. Hicks said that she became owner of several lots on Hicks <br /> Way after her mother died. III <br /> Mr. Govoni informed Mrs. Hicks that an applicant must develop a subdivision ! '' <br /> within 8 years of Planning Board's approval. He said that the Zoning Board of Appeals I� ! <br /> does not have the authority to act on the petitions until Mrs. Hicks goes back to the I" j <br /> Planning Board for subdivision approval and for approval to have the road paved. <br /> In view of the foregoing, the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals found that the !II <br /> applicant �! <br /> pp cant did not meet the criteria necessary for the granting of a Variance. Upon motion ;I <br /> duly made and seconded the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously on February <br /> 23,2000 to deny without prejudice the petition for the above-referenced Variance. <br /> i <br /> IIL <br />