03/08/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

TOWN OF MASB PEE ► �` Minutes—Zoning Board of Appeals k4 Wednesday,March 8, 2000 The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals held a meeting on Wednesday, March 8, 2000, at 7:30 P.M. at the Mashpee Town Hall. Board Members present were Chairman Edward i ;r M. Govoini and Associate Members Richard T. Guerrera,Frederick R. Borgeson and Marshall A. Brem. Board Member Robert G.Nelson,Vice Chairman James E. Regan III and Associate Member Zella E. Elizenberry were not present at the meeting. Building , Commissioner William F. Hauck and Building Inspector Russell W. Wheeler were in attendance. " CONTINUED HEARINGS Lloyd B. &Roberta Gainsboro—Request a Variance from Sections 174-31 and 174-33 J ` of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the sideline setback and front setback requirements and the setback requirements to the water and wetlands to allow for construction of a pool on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 15 Keel Way (Map 120 Block 139)Mashpee, MA. P j Sitting: Edward M. Govoni, Richard T. Guerrera and Frederick R. Borgeson. Mr. Wayne Tavares faxed a request for continuance of the hearing until March 8, 2000 to allow him time to submit revised plans. At the February 23, 2000 meeting, the Board voted to grant a continuance of the hearing until March 8, 2000. 1 At the continued hearings on March 8, 2000, Mr. Wayne Tavares, Tavares Land Design, represented the applicants and stated that the abutters and the New Seabury Corporation have been contacted regarding the project. The New Seabury Architectural Design r Review committee is still in the process of reviewing the proposal. The Conservation ;! Commission has approved the project. ), Vill; u Mr. Tavares said that due to the lot's close proximity to Great River,the proposal would encroach 8.64 feet on the 50-foot setback from the water and wetlands. Because of the shape and size of the lot, the pool can only be located in one particular corner of the lot and a sideline Variance of 12 feet is being requested. A Variance of 1.43 feet from the front setback requirements was also requested in order to expand the house to accommodate bedrooms for their growing family. Lot coverage would be less than the allowed 30%. 1 a • I• i 1 Mr. Govoni read a letter from The Little Neck Bay Association voicing its opposition to ' w," the Board granting a Variance from the front setback requirements. The letter expressed concern with difficult entrance and egress from the driveway. Mr. Tavares withdrew the request for a front setback Variance and submitted revised plans showing the proposed qi oM addition would be exactly 30 feet from the street. r�" ,br�,• +o M4I