Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning g Minutes—April 26, 2000 9 <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> Mr. Nelson moved to grant a Variance of 42 feet from the setback requirements from the t 1 <br /> water and the wetlands, subject to the following: <br /> • that the lot shall be completely cleared of all trash and debris. <br /> • that the existing structure shall be demolished prior to construction of a new <br /> dwelling. <br /> • that the installation of a new septic system would be an improvement to the lot Aja 0""" <br /> and to the neighborhood. , <br /> • criteria 1, 2, 3, 4. �• " <br /> • findings 1, 2. <br /> Mr. Borgeson seconded. All agreed. <br /> PAULINE HICKS <br /> },. �•cM <br /> The Board received a memo from Town Planner F. Thomas Fudala dated 3/24/00. The ► <br /> memo referenced the decisions rendered by the Board regarding Variance applications *„ <br /> V-00-39 (10 Hicks Way), V-00-40 (22 Hicks Way), V-00-41 (26 Hicks Way) and <br /> V-00-42 (23 Hicks Way). Mr. Fudala quoted the Board's decision that it"does not have •"04«o <br /> the authority to act on the petitions until Mrs. Hicks goes back to the Planning Board for <br /> subdivision approval and for approval to have the road paved". a� <br /> Mr. Fudala informed the Board that the "subdivision plan" for these properties "was <br /> approved by the Planning Board in 1973 and is still a valid recorded plan. While it may <br /> be necessary to have some aspects of the road design, such as drainage, updated to meet <br /> current standards before construction, such construction under subdivision control would ' <br /> not appear to have any legal connection to pursuit of a variance under zoning. It would '` " .�A <br /> seem that Mrs. Hicks would want to know how many homes she will be able to build <br /> before committing to the expense of redesign and construction of Hicks Way". <br /> Mr. Regan moved to waive the filing fees and the abutters' fees for the subject lots on <br /> Hicks Lane when Mrs. Hick's attorney re-files the applications. Mr. Regan cited that the ^t4". <br /> previous filing was recently done in January 2000 and that there was some confusion as <br /> to the validity of the subject subdivision. Mr. Nelson seconded. All agreed. <br /> p. <br /> Mr. Nelson moved to accept the Minutes of the April 12, 2000 Public Hearings. Mr. <br /> Guerrera seconded. All agreed. •t�A°"��''� <br /> Meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P.M. hP. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> C L thia�BartAC�� I i! <br /> Administrative Secretary <br /> �adh <br /> N <br /> .e,rt <br /> b <br /> f <br /> b <br />