07/12/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—July 12, 2000 3 Board of Appeals Attorney Veara said that the applicant plans on addressing the issue of signage at a later date. Mr. Regan suggested that those plans should include any proposed lighting and the entrance and exit. Mr. Brem clarified that the sign cannot be internally lit. No comments were received from abutters. „ lu Hyl' Mr. Nelson moved to grant the Special Permit, consistent with the requirements of Section 174-24.C.2 of the Zoning By-laws and upon compliance with plan dated 4-12-00. 'ui l Mr.Nelson also moved to correct the clerical error that was submitted by the applicant on the Special Permit form from Section 174-25.E.6 to Section 174-25.G.6. Mr. Guerrera seconded. All agreed. w Robert J. V..&Donna M. Roche—Request a Special Permit under Section 174-20 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to demolish an existing dwelling and construct a new V; y^01 three-bedroom dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 6 Great River Road(Map 120 Block 62) Mashpee, MA. Robert J. V. & Donna M Roche—Request a Variance from Sections 174-31 and �o 174-33 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the lot coverage requirements and the setback requirements from water and wetlands to allow for construction of a "M three-bedroom dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 6 Great River •a* I� Road(Map 120 Block 62) Mashpee, MA. Sitting: James E. Regan III, Robert G.Nelson, Marshall A. Brem. Mr. John Slavinsky of Cape & Islands Engineering represented the applicant andi"'`'"au�� submitted photos of the existing cottage. The existing cesspool currently sits 30 feet away from the water. The plans call for demolition of the existing cottage and construction of a new three-bedroom home farther away from the water. A new denitrification system would replace the cesspool. Proposed lot coverage would amount to 24.3% of the small 5,075 square-foot lot. Mr. Roche also attended the meeting. Mr. Slavinsky clarified that there would be 55 feet from the reserve area next to the septic system to the existing stonewall. The Conservation Commission determined theq,llp stonewall is the edge of the upland/wetland. The new septic system must be at least 50 feet away from this upland/wetland area. The Conservation Commission has approved the project. Mr. Nelson expressed concern that the plan does not show the accurate amount of square G lisYi footage. Mr. Slavinsky stated that the plan does comply with the Assessor's records. `' ""! . A Mr. and Mrs. Sylvester, direct abutters, attended the meeting. Mr. Sylvester said that"I d" don't, at this point and time, have a specific comment to make. But I would like to be t M recorded that we were here." Mr. Sylvester then said that he was concerned about a " l,p,. proposed 8-foot high fence. He stated that a fence of that height would be out of order with the area. .!4: q