07/12/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

4;16}N Mashpee Zoning Minutes—July 12, 2000 7 Board of Appeals , Mr. Thomas Damelio, Contractor, represented the applicant and said that the Variance p.0 ,IiI granted by the,Board on February 10, 1999 has expired. The applicant is requesting the same Variance relief as granted in Variance V-99-13. No comments were received from abutters. Mr. Guerrera moved to grant a Variance of.6% from the lot coverage requirements and a rip- 11p` Variance of 14 feet from the front setback requirements, subject to similar findings as V-99-13. Mr. Regan seconded. All agreed. CONTINUED HEARINGS Richard P. & Julia A Brady—Request a Variance from Section 174-33 of the Zoning � il, By-laws for permission to vary the setback requirements from water and wetlands to allow for construction of an attached garage with a'den and deck overhead on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 256 Monomoscoy Road(Map 120 Block 56) Mashpee, MA. Owner of record: Richard P. Brady, et al Trustees. t "'"N �,. II Sitting: James E. Regan III, Robert G. Nelson and Richard T. Guerrera. ,do�Nl Mr. and Mrs. Brady represented their application and referred to the revised plan that the Board requested at the Public Hearings on June 28, 2000. The revised plan shows the lot coverage, the square footage of upland and wetland, and proper definition of the property wl ,, line and dimensions on the property Variance of 20 feet is being requested from y line. A the water and wetlands requirements. Mr. Nelson said that the Board needs clarification of the 75-foot frontage as shown on the Assessor's records and the 89-foot frontage that appears on the plan from Cape & Islands ��I t""MI�III Engineering. Mrs. Brady said that she went to the Registry in Barnstable and got a copy of the deed showing that 14 feet of the abutting lot was purchased by a prior owner. The deed reference is Book 1339 Page 761, date: June 24, 1966. No comments were received from abutters. a Mr.Nelson moved to grant a Variance of 20 feet from the setback requirements to the "r water and wetlands, subject to criteria 1, 2 and findings 1, 2, 3 and plan with latest revision date of 7/5/00. Mr. Guerrera seconded. All agreed. h�I��.••iqt,, Mrs. Brady questioned the disposition of the Keen Appeal. The Board informed her that the matter is still under advisement and awaiting opinion from Town Counsel. ;Ib�'BII OTHER BUSINESS ,I . 1, pih» 9