Laserfiche WebLink
G�Il�ill<oy�4}p., <br /> Mashpee Zoning Minutes—August 23, 2000 3 <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> d 14,u <br /> Ms. Patricia Oakley, owner of 71 Main Street, asked if the Board had contacted any other ''gl*� <br /> Cape towns that have dormitory-style facilities. Mr. Regan confirmed that he had <br /> gathered some information from the Falmouth and said that the gaps in Mashpee's zoning '4 <br /> by-laws cause concern for the residents. <br /> Mr. Chuckie Green, a resident at 105 Main Street, voiced concern with a large group of <br /> young people living together for extended periods of time and creating noise and other <br /> problems in the neighborhood. He said that the neighborhood is currently very quiet and <br /> that a.lot of the people living on Route 130 do not lock their doors. Mr. Green said that �giN �M <br /> many of the elderly living in the neighborhood are concerned with their safety. He also t, <br /> stated that there are no other motels in Mashpee. <br /> Ms. Anna Lewis, a resident at 101 Main Street for more than 20 years, expressed her <br /> approval of the way that Dr. and Mrs. Soliz have run the motel. She said that she iss <br /> proud of where she lives and is opposed to the dormitory-type use of the subject <br /> properties. Ms. Lewis said that most of the homes on Route 130 have been improved <br /> over the years and that she does not want the neighborhood to be "ruined"with young <br /> people moving into the area. <br /> Mr.Brem said that New Seabury is "going ahead with this project,whether this is <br /> approved or not approved" by the Board. He informed those at the meeting that New <br /> Seabury has the right to use the properties as a motel and would move its employees from <br /> one unit to another every 29 days. Mr. Brem said that New Seabury is trying to explain <br /> the proposal to the neighbors. pI�IaP <br /> Ms. Cowan informed the Board that"if it does not stay up to the standard, then I will <br /> personally make sure that it gets shut down as a motel. I'm not going to sit here and '!'f; "`°'10I �►" <br /> allow it to go through for any other use;because if they were above-board in doing it and <br /> going to maintain it to the level that they say, then it shouldn't be a problem. But, to <br /> obviously they know what the issues are there. New Seabury has lots—they can build <br /> dormitory-style houses and get a variance up there and put it on their own property"and 4Nr.rI <br /> "I don't want it my neighborhood and I don't think you should approve it". <br /> Mr. Greg Peters said, "we sat down in good faith"when the motel was started and we <br /> "set down certain guidelines that were supposed to be followed"with the operation and <br /> size of the motel. He said; "I don't like the way you keep referring to everything as one <br /> piece of property." Mr. Peters said that he is opposed to the motel being changed from ar <br /> motel to a dormitory. He referred to a ZBA decision from 1982 that required the <br /> installation of a fence on the properties. It was discovered that the decision was not ,111a <br /> recorded at the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds. Mr. Peters complained that the <br /> Board did not record the decision. Mr. Brem corrected Mr.Peters and told him that the 40Il <br /> Petitioner records the decision. Mr. Peters repeated that he wants the motel and the <br /> Special Permit to remain the same. <br /> „Ir f <br />