My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/28/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
03/28/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2022 2:50:18 PM
Creation date
2/22/2022 2:49:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning Minutes—March 28, 2001 6 <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> The Board of Health subsequently issued a"stop work" order on March 5, 2001 pending <br /> revised site plans for a soil absorption system. Mr. Glass filed the revised plans within a <br /> few days. Building Commissioner Russell W. Wheeler issued his own"stop work" order <br /> because of the pendency of this Appeal. <br /> Attorney Roberts enumerated four issues with respect to the plans on which the Building <br /> permit was based. They are as follows: <br /> i ' <br /> First issue—height of the proposed building. <br /> Attorney Roberts said that based on the average original grade,the site plan shows <br /> elevation of the proposed construction would be at 38 or 39 feet, would be in violation <br /> of the 35-foot height restriction and would require a Variance from the By-laws. <br /> Attorney Kirrane said that the Petitioner is not interested in seeking a Variance from the <br /> height requirements. He stated that if the professional architectural plans are incorrect, <br /> the plans would be modified to ensure that the proposal does not exceed the 35-foot <br /> height limit. <br /> Mr. Wheeler said that if a proposed construction appears to be close to the 35-foot height <br /> limit,he requires a surveyor to positively determine the exact height of theproposed <br /> construction before a building permit is issued. <br /> i <br /> Second issue—stormwater management plan. <br /> Attorney Roberts referred to Section 174-21.LA of the By-laws and stated that"for new <br /> residential construction in excess of 1,000 square feet, which this is,that there be a <br /> system of stormwater management and artificial recharge. And Section 174.21.1.0 says <br /> that the Building Inspector shall require the submission of sufficient plans and <br /> specifications to demonstrate the location and nature of stormwater facilities". Attorney <br /> Roberts says that she has "seen no plans which deal at all with the issue of stormwater <br /> runoff. There's no calculations regarding what kind of runoff this design would <br /> engender. There's no indication on this plan or anything else I've seen as to where the <br /> runoff would go, where it's going, what kind of, whether where it's going is adequate to <br /> meet the runoff that this plan would generate". Attorney Roberts suggested that such a <br /> plan should have been submitted before issuance of a building permit. <br /> Mr.Regan stated that he would be very surprised if the Conservation Commission <br /> approved this proposal that is so close to the wetlands without an environmentally i <br /> sensitive plan. Messrs. Regan, Wheeler and Kirrane suggested that the Petitioner should <br /> consult with the Conservation Commission. <br /> Attorney Roberts simply said that she was told that the plan does not exist. <br /> Third issue—ACEC Variance granted by the Board. <br /> Attorney Roberts submitted a copy of the designation of the Washburn Island, Southcape <br /> Beach and surrounding areas up to the 11-foot contour above mean sea level that shows <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.