10/10/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—October 10, 2001 g Board of Appeals said that the Petitioner could pull one permit this year, one permit next year and also develop the lot with the building next year. Attorney Kirrane said that he understands the Boards argument. He said that the By-law does not make sense because it penalizes small developers. He said that the Petitioner does not have less rights than other property owners merely because he sits on a local Board. Ms. Elizenberry replied, "We are not trying to penalize our chairperson. Understand that very clearly". She expressed the same concerns as the other Board j members and said that " we feel you have a legitimate chance of getting building permits that will remove any hardships which you might incur and we want to recommend that you take that risk and not ask us to incur it for you". Mr. Nelson stated that the Petitioner has not "exhausted all avenues of appeal". Mr. Brem asked how many building permits remain for the year. Mr. Wheeler indicated that ! approximately 35 building permits remain. j ( I No comments were received from abutters. Attorney Kirrane said that he would have to confer with his client to consider the Board's comments. Mr. Brem said that if the Petitioner faced a hardship within the next year, then the Board would handle the request accordingly. Mr. Nelson moved to continue the Petitions until October 24, 2001. Mr. Borgeson seconded. All agreed. �I MINUTES Accept Minutes of September 19, 2001. Mr. Nelson moved to revise sentence on East Petition from "to grant a Variance" to I! "overturn the Building Commissioner's decision and found that the Petitioner does not require Variance relief to allow for construction of the patio". Mr. Borgeson seconded. All agreed. Meeting was adjourned at 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Bartos Administrative Secretary I