Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeals Sophie M. Gretchen V-99-41 2 <br /> 389 Cotuit Road (Map 22 Block 3B) <br /> At the Public Hearing on June 23, 1999, Attorney Leslie-Ann Morse represented <br /> the applicant, Mrs. Gretchen,who also attended the meeting. <br /> Mr. Govoni stated that the Board of Appeals conducted a study of the subdivision <br /> and established that any lots owned by the same person are not adjacent to each other. <br /> Attorney Morse stated that the applicant is seeking relief from the lot size and <br /> frontage requirements for the two lots. The applicant also seeks to re-establish that the <br /> lots are two separate lots as shown on the original subdivision plan. <br /> No comments were received from abutters. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> General Findings <br /> 1. the subject property is located at 389 Cotuit Road and consists of 11,420 <br /> square feet. <br /> Variance Criteria <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would <br /> involve hardship to the petitioner. <br /> Specific Finding <br /> The Board of Appeals determined: <br /> I. that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect <br /> the subject lot and not the district in which it is located. <br /> 2. that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the <br /> petitioner. <br /> 3. that a study conducted by the Planning Department revealed that one large lot <br /> does not sell for a significantly higher price than two smaller lots. <br /> 4. that relief may be granted without detriment to the public good. <br /> 5. that relief may be granted without derogating from the intent or purpose of the <br /> By-laws. <br /> 6. that without relief the lot could not be used for a residence, the purpose for <br /> which it had been laid out and for which the balance of the undersized lots in <br /> the subdivision were being used. <br /> 7. that the lot has been maintained as a separate buildable lot on the Assessor's <br /> Records (and is subject to betterments from the Water District). <br /> In view of the foregoing,the Mashpee Board of Appeals found that the applicant <br /> met the criteria necessary for the granting of a Variance. Upon motion duly made and <br /> seconded, the Board of Appeals voted unanimously on June 23, 1999 to grant a Variance <br /> of 68,580 square feet from the lot size requirements on 389 Cotuit Road, shown as Lot <br /> 3B on Assessor's Map 22 and shown as Lot 16 on a plan recorded in Barnstable Plan <br /> Book 215 Page 27. <br />