Laserfiche WebLink
...IIV <br /> kF <br /> Mashpee Zoning Minutes—December tuber 8, 1999 4 E, <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> { <br /> Mr. Kelley, an abutter, opposed the project and stated that the scope and p size of the <br /> garage are out of character with the rest of the homes in the area. Mr. I �Kelley claimed that <br /> the proposal is not a hardship and would obstruct people's views an. p p d have an adverse <br /> impact on traffic in the area. <br /> Ms. wren Murdeen stated that she has no objection t� o the construction of a garage on the ., <br /> Miller residence. However, she claimed that when she wanted to put o ' <br /> p n a farmer's parch <br /> on her home,the Building Department told her that the addition would ch <br /> ange the look <br /> and character of the street. Ms. Murdeen did not add the farmer's porch 'p to her home. <br /> She finrther questioned if the garage could be situated fin- s. Murdeen said ther back. M ' ''' <br /> i <br /> at many children, bicyclists,parents with carriages and pedestrians use the be. p beach path <br /> that abuts the Miller property. She said that anyone backing out of the ' <br /> y g Miller residence <br /> has a difficult time and a large construction would pose a further hazard f ' <br /> p or children. <br /> One of Ms. Murdeen's children's bicycles was run over b a car. Ms. Murdeen ' <br /> y en said that <br /> building such a large structure would hinder parkin availability and visibility g ty and would <br /> create a danger. She suggested that the Millers reduce the size of the or garage move it. <br /> Mr. Nelson stated that there are possible alternatives <br /> p t�ves to the proposal. .He also said that <br /> the neighbors have expressed legitimate concerns with the project. <br /> g p oJect, <br /> I I� <br /> Mr. Nelson moved to deny the application without prejudice, stating that hard <br /> . p J � g ship has not <br /> been established and that there are alternatives to the proposed construction of 11 +f <br /> p p the garage. <br /> Mr. Brem seconded. All agreed. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> Chester P. Soliz--Requests an Appeal under Section 6 Chapter ' <br /> pp apter 4oA of the Building <br /> Conunissioner's Decision for e ,<<p rnusslon to increase from seasonal operation to <br /> year-round operation of a motor lodge, La Plaza Del Sol Motel, on property located <br /> p }� <br /> in an R-5 zoning district at 66, 72 and 78 Main Street(Map 47 Blocks 8, 9, 1 o)Mash ee <br /> p <br /> MA. (Owner: Chester P. & Barbara B. Soliz, Trustees, Soliz Realty Trust. <br /> Sitting: James E. Regan III,Robert G.Nelson and Zella E.Elizenbe <br /> f'y. <br /> li I <br /> Dr. Chester Soliz and his wife represented their application and stated that the have EIE�} <br /> pp y ve run � <br /> a reputable motel for 31 years. Dr. Soliz stated that he has recently retired from his t i <br /> dental practice and proposes to run the motel during the entire year in order to pay his y, <br /> bills. He said that he would like to pay his bills by running the motel for more than just ' <br /> six months a year. La Plaza del Sol Motel is the oldest native-run business in MashP ee. <br /> Dr. Soliz stated that the Building Inspector ector and the Board of Heal <br /> th have approved the <br /> project. <br /> Mr. Greg Peters, an abutter residing at 84 Main Street, expressed opposition to the <br /> p pp <br /> proposal. He stated that the Appeal application listed 78 Main Street as part of the motel <br /> Mr. Peters submitted a zoning Board decision rendered in 1982 that did not include <br /> 78 <br /> ti <br />