Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Board of Appeals Ruth A. and James A. Warner Jr. Trs. SP-95-21 2. <br /> Comments and letters were received from abutters in opposition to the project. <br /> Direct abutters also questioned the location of structures on the land and the permits on <br /> the septic system. The Board requested elevations of the proposed structures and <br /> suggested the applicant meet with a direct abutter to review the property lines. <br /> The Board reviewed the application at the April 12, 1995 meeting and made the <br /> following findings: <br /> 1. the Board found that the application did not comply with the general or <br /> specific provisions of the Zoning and Town By-laws: <br /> 2. the application fee of$125.00 has been returned by the bank for insufficient <br /> funds. This is a violation of Section 112-1 of the Town By-laws. <br /> 3. the applicant did not present any elevations or floor plans which had been <br /> requested at the February 22, 1995 meeting of the Board. <br /> 4. the applicant did not prove that the extension of the pre-existing non- <br /> conforming use would not be a detriment to the neighborhood <br /> For the foregoing reasons the Board determined that the applicant had not met the <br /> criteria necessary to grant a Special Permit. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the <br /> Board of Appeals voted unanimously on April 12, 1995 to deny the application without <br /> prejudice. <br />