My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/12/2022 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
>
01/12/2022 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2022 10:42:21 AM
Creation date
3/11/2022 3:35:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Decision
Meeting Date
01/12/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> Owners, Jody Simes and Alexandra Simes <br /> 30 Sand Dollar Lane (Map 105 Parcel 84) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> SP-2022-02 <br /> Attorney Kirrane noted that the Conservation Commission approved the landscape plan, <br /> and the septic design concerns raised by Glen Harrington, Board of Health Agent had been <br /> resolved with respect to the garage plan that is now attached to the building. The revised <br /> plan is a result of the conversation that Mr. Dauphinais had with Dave Morris, and he <br /> believes based upon the knee walls, and the square footage of the floor above the floor <br /> below now qualifies. <br /> At the previous hearing, the plans depicted an entire second floor, and the revised plans <br /> now depict the second floor cut back leaving all the interior space as a half story space <br /> qualifying under the provisions of the bylaw as a half story. On the site plan there were two <br /> changes, one there is no need for the walls that were shown on the previous plans because <br /> given this scenario,there are no worries about the basement,and is now considered a story. <br /> There is no need to bring in fill or to argue that it is a half story. The second issue was the <br /> garage structure that was in front of the building between the home and Sand Dollar Lane <br /> that was originally attached to a pergola to the home, and is now attached to the building, <br /> and the pergola was removed. <br /> At the last meeting it was demonstrated that most of the setback criteria had dramatically <br /> improved. Some only with slight improvement, but now it is a 2-1/2 story building as <br /> opposed to a 3-story building. The Board would be well in its jurisdiction and discretion to <br /> make a determination that what is being proposed is not substantially more detrimental to <br /> the neighborhood than what currently exists. <br /> Dave Morris, Building Commissioner said when this project was first presented it had <br /> retaining walls all around the whole house and seemed to be 8 ft.tall. He said that the new <br /> plan now has many changes. The only retaining wall is located at the driveway and is a <br /> reasonable height into the embankment. The area near the foundation does not have a <br /> retaining wall except the area near the flood plain design level. He said it has improved <br /> significantly. The basement is now the first floor and is above.the design level. The second <br /> floor is fine, the third floor is the question before the Board to determine if this a true half <br /> story above grade. He believes it is approximately 55%. The last item that the Board needs <br /> to decide is that any exterior wall of said half-story shall be setback a minimum of two feet <br /> from the wall plain of the story immediately below it. The roof line that divides the wall <br /> would be allowed. The question is if the area is considered a dormer or a wall. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.