My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/08/1993 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
09/08/1993 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2022 10:06:25 AM
Creation date
3/15/2022 10:05:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• b <br /> Zown of ;ffiagbpee <br /> li d T <br /> •\ • ••��• 16 GREAT NECK ROAD NORTH <br /> MASHPEE, MA 02649 <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION <br /> FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> RE: Susan Oringer Nash for a Special Permit SP-93-77 <br /> A Petition was filed by Susan Oringer Nash of Canton, Massachusetts <br /> for a Special Permit under Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for <br /> permission to expand a non-conforming dwelling in an R-5 zoning district <br /> on property located at 57 Timberland Drive (Map 29, Block 33C) <br /> Mashpee, Massachusetts. (Owner of record: Alan E. and Suzanne Nash) . <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The <br /> Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, <br /> on August 20 and August 27, 1993, a copy of which is attached hereto <br /> and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town <br /> Hall on Wednesday, September 8, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. at which time the <br /> following members of the Board of Appeals were present and acting <br /> throughout: John J. Friel, Michael A. Makunas and Jamie Regan. <br /> Builder Pat Coffey represented the applicant and informed the <br /> Board that an earlier Special Permit for the expansion of the dwelling <br /> had lapsed. He explained that the size of the expansion had been <br /> reduced to comply with Conservation Commission and Board of Health <br /> requirements. No comments were received from abutters. <br /> The Board of Appeals made the following findings: The Board <br /> determined that the Petitioner met the conditions necessary for the <br /> granting of a Special Permit. . The Board found that the use is in <br /> harmony with the purpose and intent of the by-laws and complies with <br /> the provisions therein. . The Board determined that the topography of <br /> the lot limited possible areas for expansion and that the proposed <br /> extension would not be more detrimental to the neighborhood than the <br /> existing non-conforming use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.