My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/13/1993 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
10/13/1993 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2022 10:11:50 AM
Creation date
3/15/2022 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a A <br /> e,'. ;���• 16 GREAT NECK ROAD NORTH <br /> MASHPEE, MA 02649 <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION <br /> FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> RE: Judith F. Stanley for a Special Permit SP-93-86 <br /> A Petition was filed by Judith F. Stanley of Brea, <br /> California for a Special Permit under Section 174-17 of the <br /> Zoning By-laws for permission to expand a non-conforming <br /> structure in an R-3 zoning district on property located at 70 <br /> Uncle Percy' s Road (Map 117 , Block 177 ) Mashpee, <br /> Massachusetts. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with <br /> Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by <br /> publication in The Enterprise, a newspaper of general <br /> circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on September 24 and <br /> October 1 , 1993, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a <br /> part hereof . <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee <br /> Town Hall on Wednesday, October 13, 1993 at 7 :30 P.M. at which <br /> time the following members of the Board of Appeals were <br /> present and acting throughout: John J. Friel, Michael A. <br /> Makunas and Edward M. Govoni . <br /> Engineer John Slavinsky represented his application. He <br /> reviewed plans for the enclosure of a 12 ' x 22 ' section of the <br /> deck as an addition to the house . He explained that the <br /> addition will not result in any increase in lot coverage. <br /> The Board of Appeals made the following findings: <br /> _ 1 . the proposed change would not increase the <br /> non-conforming nature of the structure. <br /> 2 . the immediate neighborhood consists of one-story and <br /> two-story single family homes of similar size and <br /> style to the proposed structure and the proposed <br /> changes will not result in a structure or use which <br /> is more detrimental to the neighborhood than the <br /> prior non-conforming structure and its use. <br /> 3 . the plans of the proposed structure, its location on <br /> the lot , and the intended use of the structure comply <br /> with the general provisions set forth within the <br /> by-laws . <br /> it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.