My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/11/1991 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
09/11/1991 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2022 2:12:14 PM
Creation date
3/15/2022 11:44:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
v <br /> 1 Zolun of ttsh�JPE <br /> �'�•t\��%�y P. O. BOX 1108 <br /> MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION <br /> FOR A VARIANCE <br /> RE: Elizabeth K. Cramer for a Variance V-91-52 <br /> A Petition was filed by Elizabeth K. Cramer of Mashpee, <br /> Massachusetts for a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning <br /> By-laws for permission to vary the setback requirements in <br /> an R-3 zoning district on property located at 23 Keel Way (Map 120, <br /> Block 137) Mashpee, Massachusetts. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The <br /> Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, <br /> on August 27 and September 3, 1991, a copy of which is. attached hereto <br /> and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town <br /> Hall on Wednesday, September 11, 1991 at 7:30 P.M. at which time <br /> the following members of the Board of Appeals were present and <br /> F acting throughout: William J. Hanrahan, Michael A. Makunas and <br /> Cheryl A. Hawver. <br /> Attorney Jeremy Carter represented the applicant and presented <br /> plans for the construction of a two-car garage with a 28' setback <br /> from Keel Way. He informed the Board that the proposed structure <br /> would result in a 19.9% lot coverage and that there was no other possible <br /> location on the lot due to the proximity to Great River. <br /> The Board found that the topography of the lot created a <br /> hardship affecting the land in question but not affecting the <br /> zoning district in which the land is located and that relief may <br /> be granted without nullifying the intent of the By-laws or without <br /> detriment to the public good. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.