Laserfiche WebLink
minutes 3/1/78 ; <br /> r <br /> page 2 <br /> 12 ,5 To vc st in Board .of Appeals all powers a.ccordcd in 808,o <br /> 12 .6 808 says except where local ordinances and by-laws ex- <br /> pressly permit variances, no variance shall he permitted. <br /> This section empowers Board of Appeals to grant a. use <br /> variance even of not otherwise permitted. 808 wipes out <br /> variance for use; this puts it `hack in. <br /> 14.5 From 808, See. 7, par 1 , making it mandatory for the <br /> Building Inspector to state why he is not enforcing <br /> a zoning by-law law or what action he is taking to enforce <br /> - The Board of Selectmen shall received from the Planning <br /> Board their recommendations on the zoning changes and <br /> they must respond within 14 days. <br /> -- Within 65 days, the planning Board must hold a hearing. <br /> The notice must be published twice, the second notice <br /> not less than 14 days from the hearing. <br /> Notice must indicate the time, place and subject matter <br /> such as to identify it (write articles verbatim in the <br /> notice) , where people may read a c o of the proposed <br /> changes (at the Town Clerk' s offs.c e) , and a copy of the <br /> proposed changes must he mailed to the adjacent towns <br /> of Barnstable, sandwich and Falmouth t and a. copy to the <br /> Dept. of Community Affairs, and a. copy to the Cape Cod <br /> Planning and Economic Develp. Commissione <br /> �5 Planning Board Chairman shall sign an affi.davi t stating <br /> he has complied with these regulations, <br /> -- The town meeting vote must take place within 6 months <br /> of the hearing. <br /> The Planning Board should submit to the Attorney General <br /> reasons why the zoning change is being sought, <br /> GRANDFATHER PR OV s l o <br /> 80 says- any increase in area t frontage or other requirements <br /> shall not apply to a lot f or residential use which, at the <br /> time of record was not held in common ownership with a j o fining <br /> land. It makes every subdivision plan Invalid as of passing. <br /> of the by-law where lots have been sold. The Board is inves- <br /> tigating grandfather clauses to determine one which would <br /> not invalidate subdivisions totally. The Indian Land Suit <br /> has frozen development, and could cause all subdivisions to <br /> be Invalidated as of the annual town meeting. <br /> Proposed 5 Any lot shown on a plan and lawfully i <br /> e istance in compliance with the provisions of the <br /> subdivision Control Laws (Chapter 41 of the General <br /> Laws) as of January .10 1977 may thereafter b e- built <br /> upon for residential use, <br /> Meeting adjourned at 10: 0, Deirdre Greelish <br /> . � <br />