My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/23/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
08/23/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2023 5:00:30 PM
Creation date
9/15/2023 10:20:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/23/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AUGUST 23, 2023 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> B) Existing 16 Popponesset Island Road (Lot 4A) <br /> Existing Are above flood zone and landward of bank = 19,930 sq. ft. <br /> Structures (garage, house, deck, boathouse with side stairs and deck) =4,729 sq. ft. <br /> Lot Coverage= 23.7% lot coverage. <br /> Portions of the exiting single family dwelling are located within the 50 foot setback <br /> from wetlands. <br /> Thus,the following non-conformities exist: Lot Area, Lot Coverage, and Setback from <br /> Wetlands. <br /> Attorney Ford stated that he provided the Board with diagrams of the existing dwellings. There <br /> are no height non-conformities, and are required to be at 35 ft. Attorney Ford confirmed there are <br /> no existing side yard, existing rear yard or existing front yard non-conformities. There are no new <br /> non-conformities being created. <br /> Chairman Bonvie reviewed the site plan and had a few questions. He wanted to know why there <br /> is an overflow pipe depicted on the site plan. He asked for an explanation under the "General <br /> Notes"regarding the "finished floor elevation, and wanted to know the reason for the lot coverage <br /> increase from 22.5%to 24.0%,and asked if that was an increase in the non-conformity.Mr. Bonvie <br /> wanted to know the percentage of this lot that is in the flood zone. <br /> Mr. Rivera stated that the design of the down spouts are to prevent excessive rain drainage backup <br /> from the drywells so excessive water will not backf-low over the roof. The design is for a 25-year <br /> storm event. The plan also depicts the low areas so any overflow goes to yard drainage. This was <br /> approved by Conservation. Mr. Rivera explained that the surveyor does not enter a dwelling to <br /> perform a measurement, and uses the threshold of the point of entry. <br /> Mr.Rivera mentioned that there was a case that the Board had a discussion regarding upland above <br /> the flood zone and beyond the wetlands. The lot coverage was 35% and was approved to go up to <br /> 40%. Counting land in the flood zone is about 67,600 sq. ft. of upland are discounting the wetlands. <br /> There is about 14,000 sq. ft. of LSTCSF, so there is 23,000 sq. ft. of upland area. <br /> Attorney Ford stated that the reduction in the lot coverage was improved from 6.3% to 1.5%., as <br /> well as the setbacks. <br /> The Board had a discussion regarding the 15 ft. private way dep�icted on the plan as the only access <br /> to the driveway. Attorney Ford is willing to accept a condition and to provide the Board a plan <br /> depicting that there is legal access on both entrances including the easement. <br /> Chairman Bonvie asked for further comments. <br /> Mr. Furbusb stated that the lot is odd shaped and he has no issues. <br /> Mr. Morris asked if the boat house was included in the lot coverage calculations. Mr. Rivera said; <br /> yes. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.