My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/19/2023 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
09/19/2023 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 8:53:03 AM
Creation date
10/19/2023 8:51:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/19/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
$900,000. The respondent noted if the system was compatible and there would be no sewer the <br />respondent could start working on the system – just need to get financing. Turning to the <br />Commissioners, Mr. Raposa noted the respondent has an approved system and is now waiting <br />for financing – asking “when?” The respondent returned the “change in regulation” as reason <br />for putting the upgrade on pause. Mr. Seabury reiterated it was the “best available technology.” <br />It was not the case that a regulation change would cause the prior installation under current <br />regulation to be upgraded – unless there was a failure. The respondent said it would need to <br />look at the DEP and Barnstable County regulation and speak further with Mr. Seabury. In the <br />meantime, the respondent noted it will continue to pump and had time to get a new system in <br />thp <br />place to not be in violation prior to May 19, 2024. Mr. Seabury noted he wanted more <br />communication. Mr. Virgilio asked about the Title V regulations – Mr. Seabury noted they went <br />th( <br />into effect July 7 (designating new Nitrogen sensitive areas) but commercial enforcement won’t <br />th <br />be until January 2024 with full implementation two years after July 7, 2023. Mr. Seabury went <br />onto describe a watershed permit with a Nitrogen mitigation plan as a possible exception but <br />noted that wouldn’t help since being within 300’ buffer of a waterway would require an I/A <br />system in any event. The respondent asked for better communication as well. Concluding the <br />hearing, Mr. Seabury noted the BOH would stay in contact and see the respondent prior to May <br />th <br />19, 2024. <br /> <br />Sludgehammer Presentation via Zoom <br /> <br />Dr. Dan Wickham, the inventor of the Sludgehammer, gave a short company history and his <br />background. Starting his educational career at Wayne State where he obtained a master’s degree <br />(Fresh Water Biology) and culminating with a PhD from the University of California – Berkely <br />(Marine Biology). After obtaining his PhD he received a grant which was ½ time and spent the <br />other ½ working as vintner. The winery was critical to the Sludgehammer since it involved <br />industrial scale microbiology (bacteria and yeast) and the fermentation process. In 1989 Dr. <br />Wickham became involved with a group that had discovered a culture of bacteria mix that ate oil <br />– bioremediation. The bacterial blend was used to compost contaminated soil adding cow <br />manure. This led to meeting a dairy farmer who was being cited for ammonia contamination due <br />to runoff from manure lagunes. The dairy farmer asked if Dr. Wickham could use his bacterial <br />system to alleviate this problem. After inoculating the manure with bacteria blend fermentation <br />took place – causing the lessening viscosity of the manure lagunes and the realization that this <br />could be applied to wastewater. The key was to find a bacterium that was very aggressive in <br />eating waste. This turned out to be bacteria found in soil – eating dead material. This bacterium <br />grows quickly, competes with one another, and uses anaerobic fermentation to produce oxygen <br />when it is not available. Continuing his discussion on the Sludgehammer, Dr. Wickham <br />discovered adding Sludgehammer to a septic (without the bacteria mix) resulted in ammonia <br />being converted to Nitrates. After introducing the bacteria mix, nitrates in the tank were <br />undetectable. The sequence allowed for the two bacterium types to reduce nitrogen. Using drip <br />irrigation also allows the material to be used as fertilizer and further breakdown not requiring <br />leeching fields – particularly beneficial to lake properties. Comparing the standard system, Septic <br />with Sludgehammer, and Septic with Sludgehammer and drip irrigation, it was found that there <br />was a significant drop in phosphates as well with the Septic with Sludgehammer and drip <br />irrigation. (Converting anaerobic to aerobic could be the solution to phosphates). Dr. Wickham <br />noted that the Sludgehammer can be retrofitted into an existing system – a major cost savings <br />for wastewater treatment. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.