Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> Owners, Ryan Lenhart and Kristen Lenhart <br /> 81 Bluff Avenue (Map 118 Parcel 60) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> SP-2023-26 <br /> The proposed project will eliminate all rear and side yard non-conformities. The overall lot <br /> coverage of structures will decrease, and will become flood zone and building code compliant. <br /> Under the old interpretation,the lot coverage in the Popponesset Overlay District exceeds the 25% <br /> lot structure coverage at 30.1%. The proposed lot structure coverage will be decreasing at 29.3%. <br /> There will be an innovative septic system installed. The proposal includes a paved impervious <br /> surface driveway, and there will be drywells installed. There are no new non- conformities being <br /> created. This project is consistent with other newly constructed dwellings in the neighborhood. <br /> The Conservation Commission continued this project because they wanted to review the septic <br /> design and the retaining walls around the septic system. <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated for the record the reasons he believes the Board can move forward and <br /> approve the project subject to Conservation Department approval. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked why the Conservation Commission continued the project regarding the <br /> innovative septic system. <br /> Mr. Dibb said that Concom wanted clarification of the retaining walls around the septic system. <br /> They wanted to see the profile and verify that the retaining walls are necessary based on the grades <br /> and separation of ground water. Both the Conservation Commission and the Conservation staff <br /> felt that Mr. Dibb responded to their concerns regarding the septic system. <br /> Mr. Dibb said he removed an entire section of a landscape wall along Bluff Ave, and that Zack <br /> Seabury, Health Agent said that the walls around the septic system are designed appropriately <br /> and are required. <br /> Mr. Morris reviewed the site plan and noticed that the setback for the retaining wall is not at the <br /> 5 ft. requirement for the retaining wall, and noticed that the elevations are 6 ft. 8 inches, and 4 ft. <br /> of fill. <br /> Mr. Dibb said that the top of the wall is 8.5 ft. and the existing grade is 6 ft. The elevation over <br /> the system is 10.5 ft. and the wall itself is 8.5 ft. and the intention is that the wall not be over 30 <br /> inches. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked what the maximum height is on the opposite side of the wall. Mr. Dibb said <br /> elevation 6 ft. up to 8.5 ft. <br /> Attorney Kirrane said that a new house plan dated April 21, 2023 was submitted depicting the <br /> height of the house at 30 ft. from the average natural grade. There is no garage being proposed. <br /> The new revised site plan is dated April 24, 2023. The house plan does not show a roof deck. <br /> 2 <br />