My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/05/2022 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
05/05/2022 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2024 2:16:30 PM
Creation date
1/30/2024 8:56:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There being no further comments or discussion Mr. Vi UhornoUmnedtorescndthe <br /> tobacco sales violation for Omar, Inc., 135 Main Street, regarding blunt wraps based <br /> upon the board's 21 April, 2022 decision. Ms. Patel seconded. Roll Call Vote: Ernest <br /> V|rgi|io /yes\, Kripani Patel (yes) Brian Baurngaertel /yeS\. VOTE: Unanimous (3-D) <br /> 2~ Review of revised Design Plan—200 Great Neck Road North—AU Realty Corp. <br /> K4r, VirgiUo recVsed himself ofthis discussion. <br /> The design plans that include the Singu|air treatment system were received hmthe BC]H <br /> on April 29, 2022. The board must review and approve the plans 6v May 2qmtomeet <br /> the DEP'stimeline. Mr. Harrington commended that heasked if the board could review <br /> the plans in open session and Town Counsel had this reply: The Board could review the <br /> plans in either open session or executive session, as it may deem appropriate. If it chooses to <br /> discuss the alternative system in open session, /would advise that the discussion be <br /> restricted to the system specifications and matters related thereto, with no reference to <br /> ^Yego/"aspects ofor the issues raised/n the pending [ADRappeal. K;r. Harrington <br /> recommends that the open session would be fine asvve always review plans inopen <br /> session. Just no mention of legal issues. There are technical comments that Mr. <br /> Harrington will review at the meeting. <br /> 01R. HARR|NGTON: An initial review was done and menne up with a laundry list. Brian <br /> Yergatian of BSC Group was looking to do one system so that they had economies of <br /> scale where they didn't have to have several systems. The plans showed 3 Singu|air <br /> systems that are proposed. | think they had 4at one point. So they have reduced it. <br /> They have 3systems. One that is2,O9Oga||ons/day; system 2ioI,76Oga||ons/day, <br /> system 3 is 6,130ga||on"/dmy. Systems 1[&2 have the Sin8u|airsysterns but they have <br /> standard pressure distribution type of leech fields, where, system #3, over 6,000 <br /> gallons/day is going to be put through drip dispersal which is the perk-right drip <br /> dispersal system. This isa smaller diameter tube with emits oni1 that are vibrated into <br /> the ground, 6-12 inches below grade. | have additional questions because there isno <br /> real detail for that system and it's the largest leeching system which is also on quite the <br /> hill. There is pretty large difference in grade behind units21, 22, and unit 5 that goes <br /> down and parallels the river. |'rn interested in how they're going to lay out the long <br /> laterals, mr potentially how they're going todothat. <br /> There is a recreational vehicle that was thrown in after one of the units burned. Cottage <br /> #4 burned several years ago and Rich Albert and the previous owner put aR\/there. <br /> This was never approved asa temporary home. | think the board should order the <br /> removal of that because itis not an approved dwelling. |{they want to rebuild the <br /> cottage,that's fine, but get the RV out mfthere. <br /> My second comment is that there isnm main sewer line shown from unit 9 and unit 7 <br /> that attaches to the one of the main sewer lines. There's no details for the leeching for <br /> system 3. We don't know exactly how they're going to lay out the laterals,which is <br /> going to be hugely important. There's no protections for water and sewer line <br /> intersections. We need to see where they're going to issue protections where new <br /> sewer lines are going tm cross existing potable water lines. | didn't see anything <br /> specified on there. And they're still showing an outlet for the laundry. |tisnny <br /> understanding that the laundry was going tmberemoved. | think as long asthe laundry <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.