Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> APPEAL OF THE BUILDING COMMISSIONER' S DECISION <br /> DEER Realty Trust, Janice Copp Burns, Trustee <br /> 363 Monomoscoy Road, Map 120 Parcel 18 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> AP-2023-42 <br /> Attorney Kirrane does not believe the Town Planner's opinion is accurate. The case law is clear <br /> that a husband and wife can certainly own properties that are adjacent to each other without under <br /> common ownership or common control. <br /> Attorney Kirrane mentioned that one of case a daughter owned one property, and the Trust owned <br /> the adjacent property which that daughter was the Trustee, and her mother was the beneficiary. <br /> The Court said that this was not common ownership. The reason the Court found that it was not <br /> common ownership was because under the Trust, the Trustee owns the fiduciary duty to the <br /> beneficiary. The beneficiary is not the mother, it's the Trustee's wife. <br /> Mr. Reidy asked if the way the property was utilized by the separate parties over the years in any <br /> way determinative. <br /> Attorney Kirrane said that the lot at 363 Monomoscoy is vacant. No one uses it. He provided the <br /> Gallagher case which sets forth various factors which Courts consider. The Town of Mashpee <br /> since 1962 and beyond assessed these properties separately.They are not treated as combined. The <br /> field card said that 363 Monomoscoy Road is developable. The mother has no control over 363 <br /> Monomoscoy Road. A fence that runs along both 363 Monomoscoy and 7 Cricket Way does not <br /> determine as common ownership because it runs beyond these two properties. <br /> Chairman Bonvie asked for final comments from the Building Commissioner and the Board. Mr. <br /> Morris stated for the record that 363 Monomoscoy Road is in the flood zone, and unlikely to <br /> receive a Variance from the Board. <br /> Chairman Bonvie noticed that most of the deeds were conveyed for one dollar. He reviewed the <br /> deeds, and believes that there is control among both properties. <br /> Mr. Reidy does not believe the burden of proof has been fulfilled. <br /> The Board finds that both 363 Monomoscoy Road and 7 Cricket Way are held in common <br /> ownership with the understanding that Dene R. Burns who owns 7 Cricket Way and Erlmest E. <br /> Burns who owns 363 Monomoscoy Road do have "common control" together over these two <br /> properties, and that the supplemental case law documentation provided by Attorney Kirrane did <br /> not provide specific evidence that both lots were held separately at the time of the zoning change. <br /> 3 <br />