Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> Owners, James C. Atkins and John J. Weltman <br /> 80 Punkhom Point, Map 100 Parcel 4 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> FINDING-2023-51 <br /> In view of the foregoing,the Board determined the Petitioner met the criteria for a Written Finding. <br /> Upon motion duly made and seconded at the Public Hearings on Wednesday, September 13,2023, <br /> the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to issue a Written Finding to Owners, James C. <br /> Atkins and John J. Weltman under §174-17 and §174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for <br /> construction of a garage, and additions, alterations on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, <br /> Map 100 Parcel 4, Mashpee, MA with the following conditions: <br /> 1. The Board has determined that the applicant meets all the conditions of a Written Finding <br /> under Mass General Law 40A Section 6. <br /> 2. Site Plan — Prepared for: James C. Atkins & John J. Weltman, 80 Punkhom Point Rd., <br /> Mashpee, MA. Sheet No.: 1 of 1, Date: July 7, 2023, Drawn by: MPR, Checked by: MC, <br /> Prepared by: Cape & Islands Engineering, Drawing Title: Proposed Addition Plan (No <br /> increase in flow), Stamped and signed by: Mark D. Dibb, No.: 45937, Registered <br /> Professional Engineer, and Matthew C. Costa,No.: 52282,Professional Land Surveyor. <br /> 3. Garage Plans & Elevations: Prepared for: Weltman Residence, 80 Punkhom Point Rd., <br /> Mashpee,MA. Scale:As noted,Date: 5/27/23,Drawn by JLB, Sheet No.:G1: Garage First <br /> Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, G2: Design Development. Prepared by: Jennifer Birnstiel, <br /> Archiplicity, LLC. House Plans: Sheet: 1: First Floor Plan, 2: Second Floor Plan, 3: <br /> Basement Floor Plan, 4: Front & Left Side Elevations, 5: Rear Elevation & Right Side <br /> Elevation. <br /> 4. Conditioned on all Town Department comments read into the record including but not <br /> limited to the Board of Health and Conservation Dept. comments and conditions read into <br /> the record. <br /> 5. Conditioned that the upstairs of the proposed garage area to remain unfinished and <br /> inhabitable. <br /> 6. The Board finds that the proposed project is not substantially more detrimental than the <br /> pre-existing, non-conforming structure to either the Town or the neighborhood. <br /> 7. Any changes to the plans will require the applicant to return to this Board. <br /> 8. The Board finds that the application as submitted is not substantially more detrimental than <br /> what existed prior to the removal of the existing structure, and that there is adequate land <br /> area to provide sufficient parking, and there are no new non-conformities being created. <br /> 4 <br />