Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> FEBRUARY 23, 2022 <br /> 3. Conditioned on all Town Department comments read into the record. <br /> 4. The Board issues a Variance setback from the wetlands is in the <br />amount of 5 ft.the <br /> allowed setback from wetlands is 50 ft., and the total amount <br />sought is 45 ft. <br /> 5. Conditioned that any and all changes to the plans will require the <br />applicant to return <br /> to the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br /> 6. The Building Commissioner requested that a building permit will be <br />required and <br /> all inspections obtained prior to the use of the said stairs. <br /> Mr. Gould seconded, yes <br /> Mr. Blaisdell, yes, <br /> Mr. Goldstein,yes, <br /> Mr. Bonvie, yes, <br /> Mr. Furbush, yes. <br /> All were in favor of the Variance request. <br /> 162 Whippoorwill Circle: Owners, Stewart M. Dobson and Barbara A. <br />Dobson request <br /> a Variance under §174-31 of the Zoning Bylaws to vary the height of a <br />single family <br /> residence on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, Map 125 <br />Parcel.140, Mashpee, <br /> MA. <br /> Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented the homeowners of the Variance <br />request relative to <br /> the height of a recently reconstructed building structure on their property. <br />The Board <br /> granted a Variance back in 2018.As provided in his written presentation <br />the bylaw Section <br /> 174-17.1 had not yet been adopted and did not have the Special Permit <br />criteria. The <br /> Building Commissioner at the time felt that every project that called for a <br />raze and replace <br /> required variance relief if it was situated on a non-conforming lot. The <br />applicant applied <br /> for variance relief and received a Variance to raze and replace a single <br />family structure on <br /> this non-conforming lot. <br /> The building has been completed since June of 2021 and does not have a <br />Certificate of <br /> Occupancy because of the height issue. The building is 1.8 feet higher <br />than the permissible <br /> 35 ft. height restriction in this particular zoning district. As some point <br />during the <br /> <br />