Laserfiche WebLink
. r <br /> r = <br /> f ` <br /> TOWN OF MASHPEE <br /> BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> March 18, 1993 <br /> Meeting called to order at 7: 00 p.m. <br /> Members present: Stephen J. Greelish, Steven R. Ball and <br /> John T. Doherty. <br /> THE TAPE IS NOT PART OF THE MEETING, IT IS FOR THE PURPOSE <br /> OF TRANSCRIPTION ONLY. <br /> Mr. Stephen J. Greelish, Chairman. <br /> 1 . ) Warrants signed. <br /> 2. ) Mr. Ball motioned to accept the minutes of March 11, <br /> 1993 , Mr. Doherty seconded, all in favor. <br /> APPOINTMENT: J. Carter/P. Foley - 276 Monomoscoy Rd. <br /> Mr. Carter, P. Sullivan of Baxter & Nye and Mr. & Mrs. <br /> Foley were in attendance for this scheduled appointment. <br /> Mr. Carter stated: "Two main issues remain outstanding <br /> from the last meeting. One was four feet of permeable soil <br /> from the bottom of the leaching facility and the second was <br /> DEP probably not allowing an addition to the dwelling due to <br /> distance from the wetland. Mr. Carter stated that Mr. Sulli- <br /> van is present to answer any technical questions. " <br /> Mr. Greelish asked if anything has changed. <br /> Mr. Sullivan replied: "No. There is only 2 .5' of natur- <br /> al permeable soil. We are proposing to remove to top and sub <br /> soil and replace it with permeable soil and setting the sys- <br /> tem on top of that. We perked to top and sub soil and it <br /> does perk at 2 minutes per inch, but whether this is consid- <br /> ered suitable material is questionable. In field classifica- <br /> tion it is considered loam and sub." <br /> I <br /> Mr. Evans stated he did witness the perk test in the <br /> top and sub soil <br /> Mr. Sullivan stated that the wetlands were identified <br /> by Sanford Botanist and Conservation agreed with the line on <br /> the West. On the East Conservation felt the line should be <br /> the retaining wall which we did. "This is the best we can do <br /> geometrically. The primary and reserve are planned to be in- <br /> stalled to spread out the loading rate. " <br /> Mr. Carter stated the DEP' has indicated in'writing that <br /> the addition, deck and septic upgrade were not located in <br /> the restricted wetlands. <br />