Laserfiche WebLink
r � <br /> MAS11P E CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br /> MEETING of MARCH 24, 1988 <br /> COMMISSIONERS PRESENT, V. Louise Behrman, C ar'o l Jacobson, Joseph Burns., Mary <br /> Marsters and Elliot Rosenberg. <br /> Also present was Lisa Hanscom,, Conservation Agent. <br /> B ECH OOD POINT: Bill Burbank and Nora Hayes, Arborist, of BSC discussed what <br /> had been done. Drawings were displayed showing all the cutting done. Pointing <br /> to the drawings , Mr. Bu.rbank stated, taking a typical section going up the <br /> center of the slope where heavy cutting was done and again at the crest of <br /> the hill and towards the pond, the graphic represents an approach that if <br /> they were to reegetate on a one to one basis would destroy the entire slope <br /> because of the plant material needed to be planted like a plantation in a <br /> nu-rsery which requires planting balls in a repetitive form. Two Thirds of <br /> the slope would be disturbed more than it is now. <br /> Their approach is to leave more of the root structure in place and infill <br /> the major openings on the slope with new vegetation, being very sensitive <br /> to the issues on the pond and the question of fill in terms of blocking the <br /> view to Building 7 and how to revegetate the slope. They recommend use of <br /> small material indigenous to the slope and to plant within the areas where <br /> the root structures would allow planting. There is the possibility of <br /> setting a crane up at the more open part of the top of the slope where <br /> there is the potential of moving in to plant further down the slope. <br /> It was agreed at the Planning Board Meeting that an independent arborist <br /> should be employed at the expens'e of the owners to review proposals , crake <br /> adjustments and mare recommendations to the town. The methodology should <br /> be reviewed by this third party. <br /> Lisa questioned the circles of canopies shown on the drawings and asked <br /> if that was the normal canopy or as left after pruning. <br /> Mr. Hayes stated it would be assumed as the normal diameter for that part- <br /> icular <br /> a. t- <br /> icular tree. Lisa stated this should be adjusted as some of the trees have - <br /> been pruned. <br /> Mr. Burbank reproved that particular drawing. <br /> Mr. Hayes gage his credentials . die pointed out the spawning beds for th-e <br /> Bass and stated extreme care, even with people walking, must be taken with <br /> the revegetation of that area. There are 20 small American Beech trees <br /> that will grow and stabilize the bank which is covered with moss and lichen. <br /> There are also small Tupelos scattered in there. BSC thought it would be <br /> appropriate to get containerized stock and plant i t very carefully along <br /> the bank under strict supervision. There was a " Tupelo cut down which <br /> cannot be replaced in that, location as the environmental damage done to <br /> replace that tree would be worse than the end result. <br /> 1n the plateau, on a 20 foot stretch, they propose Red Maples , Tupelos, <br /> Beech and perhaps Aspen. They propose larger caliper trees -6" . They <br /> question using machinery on the bank or going with smaller diameter trees <br /> and replanting the midstor,y using 2-3 or 3-6". This will be the Board ' s <br /> decision. <br /> Underneath that, they propose the native shrubs that would be characteristic <br />