My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-BOARD OF HEALTH
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
BOARD OF HEALTH
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001-BOARD OF HEALTH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2019 2:41:54 PM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:22:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/31/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br /> Mr. Ball asked what they were looking for from the BOH members. Did they <br /> want the BOH to waive the reserve requirement? <br /> Mr. Doyle responded that what he is asking for is if he goes to an innovative <br /> alternative system. He will have to pick up a few more units. The cost of the <br /> units without the necessity of installing a reserve would certainly help the <br /> overall costs of this project. <br /> Mr. Ball said that that would be the buy off. <br /> Mr. Doyle continued that the stuff is going out of there so clean at this point in <br /> time. That it is only going to be enhanced by the treatment and he feels no need <br /> for a reserve to be installed. Financially it is a killer. <br /> Mr. Ball asked what type of system he was looking at. <br /> Mr. Doyle responded that he is looking around. He has used different types of <br /> systems. Quite possibly a Fast system. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that even by using the Fast or alternative systems they're <br /> allowed fifty credits. For example, there is a 50% reduction in the size of the <br /> leaching area. Granting the variance to the reserve or at least not building out <br /> the reserve they can provide an equal area for it without building it out. Allowing <br /> them to reduce the size of it provides everybody with a win/win situation. We <br /> are looking at an effluent that is being treated by a near pristine nitrogen-wise <br /> because it is so low right now. There is no doubting that it does discharge into <br /> one of the estuaries. They do need to take a look at that. <br /> Mr. Santos interjected that they may be in need of some monitoring wells also <br /> because right now there are two old cesspools. <br /> Mr. Harrington continued that the state has allowed those credits to be granted <br /> and the BOH needs to allow that and look at it. They are not trying to put people <br /> out of business. But, they are trying to protect the environment. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that he was in agreement with that recommendation. He would <br /> go along with a Fast System or whatever; He would go along with granting a <br /> variance not to install a reserve. He feels that that is a great buy-off. He didn't <br /> believe that they could force him to automatically put in a denitrification system <br /> because they were over the 600 gallons per day and it was not a new system. <br /> Any new system that comes into town that is over 600 gallons automatically has <br /> to put in a denitrification system. <br /> Mr. Harrington and Mr. Doyle began speaking at the same time. Mr. Doyle said <br /> that that is a "catch-22". Mr. Harrington stated that the regulations existing at <br /> the time of transfer are applicable. Therefore, that is why they want to upgrade <br /> the system voluntarily. But, two years down the line, should the homeowner <br /> want to retire and sell off the place. She doesn't want to have to go back, tear up <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.