Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> X. Comparative Evaluation Criteria <br /> • The Town places a premium on the Proposer's approach to the project and the <br /> ability to present a program of services which complies with the required <br /> Scope of Services in a manner which is clear, concise and complete with <br /> respect to required activities. The Town will find it unacceptable if such a <br /> program of services is not included, or is included in an incomplete manner. <br /> Proposals, which address required items, but only in general or vague terms, <br /> which do not adequately represent tasks to be performed will be given the <br /> rating of not advantageous. Proposals which address all required items in an, <br /> adequate manner but are unclear in some respects or which leave questions on <br /> the part of the Town as to key aspects of the manner in which tasks will be <br /> performed will be given the rating of advantageous. Proposals, which excel in <br /> all respects in clearly and concisely addressing all required elements of the <br /> Scope of Services shall be given the rating of highly advantageous. The Town <br /> reserves the right, upon the basis of such evaluations, to reject the proposal of <br /> any and all Proposers who do not, in its sole estimation, qualify under such <br /> evaluations or if the evaluation or other investigations indicate that rejection <br /> of any such Proposer is in the Town's best interest. <br />