My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1970-1975-ZBA APPEALS - BLACKBOOK (2)
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
1970-1975-ZBA APPEALS - BLACKBOOK (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2025 11:51:59 AM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:37:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TOWN OF MASHPEE <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> New Seabury Corporation, Petitioner <br /> Appeal No. April 6,1973 <br /> FACTS AND DECISION <br /> The petitioner brings this appeal under the provisions of <br /> Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Section 13 alleging <br /> that it is aggrieved by a decision of the building inspector <br /> refusing to grant a building permit for the construction <br /> of 177 dwelling units to be contained in multi-family buildings , <br /> a health club and reception building to be constructed in R-2, <br /> t zoning district. <br /> Petitioner concedes that the proposed construction does not <br /> meet the requirements of the zoning by laws enacted by the <br /> } town by a vote August 4, 1971 , and duly approved by the <br /> attorney general . <br /> Petitioner contends that the land is subject to the zoning <br /> by law enacted in 1961 under which it claims to have obtained <br /> a special permit. The 1961 zoning by law provided for the <br /> creation of a cluster zoning district . A copy of this by <br /> law is appended hereto as well as a copy of the special <br /> permit , so called, granted to petitioner 's predecessor in <br /> title dated September 21 , 1964. <br /> Although evidence was not offered to show that petitioner has <br /> complied with the requirements then in effect (1964) counsel <br /> stated that petitioners predecessor in title fulfilled the <br /> requirements including the conveyance of a portion of registered <br /> land sufficient to constitute a dominant tenement to the town . <br /> Additionally, petitioner argues that it is entitled to the <br /> protection of the provisions of General Laws Chapter 40A Section 7A <br /> by reason of the submission of its plans prior to the time that the <br /> 1971 zoning by law went into effect. The Board takes the position <br /> that the 1971 zoning by laws became effective upon enactment by <br /> the Town (August 4, 1971 ) and since the date of signing of the <br /> plan appended to the application was September 20,1972 by the <br /> Planning Board "Planning Board Approval Not Required, " the <br /> petitioner is not entitled to the protection afforded by this <br /> statute. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.