Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br /> 7. How long has appellant; owned the property? - Including the period <br /> when it was owned iby Popponessett Corporation, over 30 years. <br /> 8. Present use of premises: The land has been cleared and graded; a <br /> septic system has been installed; concrete.footings have been <br /> placed; foundations poured and framing to second story has taken <br /> place; all in accordance with building permits numbers 1547, <br /> 1548 and 1549 issued by the Building Inspector, and signed by the <br /> Selectmen dated January 19, 1972; disposal works construction <br /> permit #14 issued by the Mashpee Board of Health and dated <br /> January 19, 1972; and approval of the Massachusetts Department <br /> of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health by letter dated <br /> July 5, 1972. <br /> 1 <br /> 9. Proposed use of premises: Three buildings, each containing 24 dwelling <br /> units, all as shown on plans on file with the Building Inspector. <br /> 10. Additional facts: Construction work under the building permits dated <br /> January 19, 1972 began April 6, 1972 and continued without <br /> interruption until it reached the point of framing to the second <br /> floor of each building. <br /> On November 21, 1972, without previous warning or explanation, <br /> the permits were removed from the job site by the Assistant <br /> Building Inspector. On November 24, 1972, New Seabury Corporation <br /> received a letter as follows: <br /> "Dear Sir: <br /> Because of the violation of Mashpee zoning laws,. I must revoke <br /> permits on condominiums on Triton Sound until further notice. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> s/ Harold Collins <br /> Assistant Building Inspector" <br /> 11. Grounds of this appeal: New Seabury Corporation is aggrieved by this <br /> decision or order of the Assistant Building Inspector and says that <br /> he acted erroneously and under a misapprehension of the applicable, <br /> facts and law; that New Seabury Corporation •is entitled, as a matter <br />