Laserfiche WebLink
Peterson Decision Page Two <br /> This plan was presented to the Board of Appeals for considera- <br /> tion of a frontage variance of the combined Lots 28 and 29. <br /> A statement by the Petitioner during the course of the <br /> hearing to the effect that she received only one tax bill <br /> each year rather than six individual tax bills resulted in <br /> an inquiry directed to the Assessors ' Office as to the status <br /> of Petitioner ' s property. Information furnished by the <br /> Assessors ' Office revealed that Petitioner had filed a new <br /> plan in 1973 which eliminated lot lines shown on Land Court <br /> Plan 11408-C , thus �`c)reating one undivided piece of property <br /> containing 1.45 acres of land. <br /> DECISION <br /> The Board of Appeals voted unanimously to deny the <br /> petition since no action can be taken by this Board to vary <br /> non-existent lot lines. <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> ��0. � � <br /> R E G F. IV E D Clara L. Keliinui , Chairman <br /> MASHPEE TOWN CLERK <br /> R.,Y�/nGp l2LCe ' Mi n�as , Vice Chairman <br /> L da Edson Hendricks , clerk <br />