Laserfiche WebLink
d) Condition Number 5 of the Decision, insofar as it <br /> may prohibit the conduct of business between ven- <br /> dors at the flea market prior to 9 A.M. , is unrea- <br /> sonable. It is common practice, and the nature of <br /> the flea market business . requires, that vendors <br /> set up as well as buy merchandise and conduct <br /> business among themselves starting as early as <br /> 6 A.M. , .prior to the opening of the market for <br /> public participation, which is generally at $ A.M. <br /> Any prohibition of this kind of pre-opening trade <br /> among vendors, and 3 A.M. opening to the public, <br /> would render Plaintiff ' s flea market business unable <br /> to compete with other flea market businesses in <br /> the area of the Property, and would severely under- <br /> mine the financial viability of Plaintiff ' s flea <br /> market business; <br /> e) The grading requirements imposed by Condition <br /> Number 13 of the Decision are unreasonable and <br /> arbitrary. Such requirements are overly broad and <br /> ambiguous, are not based upon any actual engineer- <br /> ing data or analysis regarding drainage on and <br /> from the Property, would create drainage patterns <br /> which would be destructive to the Property, and <br /> could be performed only at inordinate cost to <br /> Plaintiff; <br /> f) Condition Number 14 of the Decision, which limits <br /> the validity of the special permit granted therein <br /> to a two-year duration, is unreasonable and <br />