Laserfiche WebLink
TOWN OF MASHPEE <br />BOARD OF APPEALS <br />New Seabury Corporation, Petitioner <br />Appeal No. April 6,1973 <br />FACTS AND DECISION <br />The petitioner brings this appeal under the provisions of <br />Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Section 13 alleging <br />that it is aggrieved by a decision of the building inspector <br />refusing to grant a building permit for the construction <br />of 177 dwelling units to be contained in multi -family buildings, <br />a health club and reception building to be constructed in R-2, <br />zoning district. <br />Petitioner concedes that the proposed construction does not <br />meet the requirements of the zoning by laws enacted by the <br />town by a vote August 4, 1971, and duly approved by the <br />attorney general. <br />Petitioner contends that the land is subject to the zoning <br />by law enacted in 1961 under which it claims to have obtained <br />a special permit. The 1961 zoning by law provided for the <br />creation of a cluster zoning district. A copy of this by <br />law is appended hereto as well as a copy of the special <br />permit, so called, granted to petitioner's predecessor in <br />title dated September 21, 1964. <br />Although evidence was not offered to show that petitioner has <br />complied with the requirements then in effect (1964) counsel <br />stated that petitioners predecessor in title fulfilled the <br />requirements including the conveyance of a portion of registered <br />land sufficient to constitute a dominant tenement to the town. <br />Additionally, petitioner argues that it is entitled to the <br />protection of the provisions of General Laws Chapter 40A Section 7A <br />by reason of the submission of its plans prior to the time that the <br />1971 zoning by law went into effect. The Board takes the position <br />that the 1971 zoning by laws became effective upon enactment by <br />the Town (August 4, 1971) and since the date of signing of the <br />plan appended to the application was September 20,1972 by the <br />Planning Board "Planning Board Approval Not Required," the <br />petitioner is not entitled to the protection afforded by this <br />statute. <br />