Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> P. O. BOX 1108 <br /> MASHPE E, MA 02649 <br /> DECISION <br /> FOR A VARIANCE <br /> RE: Petition of Barry Stone for a Variance Case: V-88-09-087 <br /> A Petition was filed by Barry Stone of Mashpee, Massachusetts for a <br /> Variance under Section 7. 7, 7.4 and I1C of the Land Space Requirements for <br /> permission to construct a garage and deck on property located at 17 Compass <br /> Circle (Map 105, Lot 256) Mashpee, Massachusetts. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in the Falmouth Enterprise, <br /> a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on October 12 and <br /> October 19, 1988, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A public hearing was held on the petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, October 26, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. at which time the following members <br /> of the Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Michael Makunas, <br /> Edward Govoni and Richard Halpern. <br /> The Board was informed that the Petition was presented for a Variance <br /> under Section 11C of the A.C.E.C. but the Applicant now learned that the area <br /> is not designated as such. Mr. Jim Pavlik of New Seabury Engineering presented <br /> plans showing an existing house and deck 12' from wetlands. The Applicant <br /> proposes to build an addition which will not be any closer to the wetlands <br /> than the present location of the house. .Mr. Pavlik had met with the Conservation <br /> Commission and reduced the size of a proposed deck at their request. Mr. <br /> Pavlik explained that an equal exchange of land with an abutter was involved. <br /> The Board determined that there were unique circumstances relative to the <br /> topography which specifically affect the land in question, but do not affect <br /> generally the zoning districtinwhich the land is located and that a literal <br /> - enforcement of the by-law would involve substantial hardship. <br />