1990 JAN-JUN-ZBA APPEALS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF APPEALS P. & H. Trust - SP-90-29 2. Special Permits were required for each individual use within the complex, and that the Applicant had complied with this requirement. Building E, which is to be affixed to Building D, will consist of 13,058 square feet. Mr. Dunning reported that the project had been presented to the Design Review Committee, which had approved the plans. Mr. Dunning demonstrated that the Petitioner's plans satisfied the requirements of Section 174.31 as to minimum lot size, frontage, setbacks and lot coverage. The plans presented to the Board indicated that there are 293 parking spaces for the entire Deer Crossing Marketplace complex, which exceeds the 276 parking spaces which are required for the project under the Zoning By-law. Peter Hartel, speaking on behalf of the Petitioners, indicated that the proposed building would be used for .office and general retail purposes. The Board was advised that water would be supplied from the Mashpee Water District, and that the access to Shellback Way would be opposite the recently approved street on the north side of Shellback Way. Further, the Board noted that the long range plan for the site as proposed by the Town Planner, calls for the conversion of the existing parking lot driveway to Route 28 to a "right-in, right out" configuration, in order to ameliorate visibility and safety considerations at the site, at such time as traffic signalization of the Route 28/ Shellback Way intersection is in place. The Petitioners indicated that they anticipated implementing this traffic plan when signalization was completed. It was also suggested that the finish coat of asphalt on the existing parking lot at the Deer Crossing Marketplace complex has never been completed, as there is only a binder course of pavement in place at this time. The Petitioners indicated that they anticipated completing the top course of pavement for the entire Deer Crossing Marketplace complex. The Board of Appeals, based on evidence presented by the Petitioners and their representatives, on testimony of the public hearing, on its site inspection and on recommendations made by the Town boards