Laserfiche WebLink
could pay the DPW to repaint the crosswalk Mr. Rowley expressed concern about the <br />crosswalk if there was no night time lighting, but Mr. Fudala indicated that was the responsibility <br />of the Street Light Committee. <br />Mr. Fudala read into the public record a letter from Joseph Feeks, resident of Windchime, <br />regarding his concern about the facility's impact on traffic, particularly during the summer. Mr. <br />Feeks recommended a traffic light as a condition to the project but the Chair responded that a <br />traffic light was an unlikely solution to the traffic problem in that area. Mr. Balzarini <br />recommended first seeing Mashpee Commons' plans for the area. The Chair added that the <br />facility was unlikely to add much additional traffic other than from workers during shift changes. <br />Mr. Hayes also suggested speed limits reduced to 35 or 30 in the area. Mr. Fudala responded <br />that the Planning Board could not address the speed limit but that it would need to go to the <br />Board of Selectmen and DPW. The Chair stated that a well -advertised cross walk and beacon <br />will slow vehicles down. <br />Mr. Fudala gave his report referencing the Board of Selectmen vote and the archeological study <br />and the State Division of Wildlife and Fisheries determination that the project was not <br />prohibitive and the site could be developed because it was in a mapped area. Additionally, Mr. <br />Fudala noted that a previous developer proposed a less attractive building for the site one year <br />ago. Mr. Fudala pointed out that the applicant requested three waivers in an April 6 letter and <br />read the letter into public record. Mr. Fudala recommended a vote on the waivers so that the <br />applicant had guidance from the Planning Board. The Chair wanted to hold on a vote until <br />reviewing the landscape plan and the Chair requested a visual/street level landscape plan. Mr. <br />Rowley noted that some of the landscaping would be on the slope down toward the building. <br />Referencing the rear 10 foot buffer, Mr. Rowley indicated that the plan shows a 10 foot buffer <br />and any changes would need to be referenced on the plan. Mr. Fudala stated that he would like <br />written reassurance from the Fire Department that they will be able to set up on the south side of <br />the building on the gravel road. The Chair summarized the requested information from the Fire <br />Department to include: that on the side facing Great Neck Road, that there was no road; that the <br />Fire Department could use the gravel road; and that 22 feet was adequate to set up on the south <br />side of the building. <br />Mr. Rowley referenced the access road and inquired further about the location of the gate. If the <br />gate was relocated it could keep the site free and open to circulation. The location of the <br />dumpster will require that the truck back up. Mr. Rowley has recommended that the length of <br />the access be paved to Great Neck Road, with signage that the road was for service and <br />emergency vehicles only, providing a better emergency access and would then not require the <br />trash truck to turn around. Mr. Rowley recommended that further discussion occur with <br />Mashpee Commons. Also, a good surface would be needed for plowing, Mr. Rowley also noted <br />that plans needed to be submitted regarding the lift station to the wastewater treatment facility. <br />Mr. Rowley inquired about the sidewalk plans and inspections and whether the Planning Board <br />would make it a condition since nothing had been submitted. Mr. Rowley inquired about water <br />flow due to fire sprinklers that would be installed, so more information was needed regarding the <br />water main. Mr. Burke indicated that he had spoken with the Water Department and the water <br />amain ends in front of Windchime, approximately 15 inches. Currently a 2 inch pipe travels in <br />front of the property. Referencing the retention area in the back, Mr. Rowley noted the 100 year <br />