Laserfiche WebLink
The appointed time having arrived, the Chair opened the 7:30 public hearing for Naukabout Beer <br />Company, LLC and read for the record the public hearing notice. <br />MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to continue the public hearing to 7:50 p.m. Mr. <br />Kooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br />Mr. Hansen inquired about a chain link fence surrounding the conservation restricted areas and <br />inquired whether it would be relocated closer to the road. Mr. Falacci responded that it would <br />not and reported that the restricted area had been held by Orenda, who had wanted it delineated. <br />Land was being swapped, and it was noted that since the land was for wildlife, some of the chain <br />link fence would be removed. <br />Mr. Rowley reported that he had been in regular contact with Mr. Crispin regarding the project, <br />and Mr. Rowley's requests had been incorporated into the project. Regarding the retaining wall <br />at the entrance, Mr. Rowley pointed out that it was not yet identified on the plan and <br />recommended that a rendering be submitted to ensure proper site distance. Mr. Falacci will <br />forward it to Mr. Rowley prior to construction. Mr. Fudala expressed concern about the plans in <br />relation to the Water District and Mr. Falacci responded that they had been reviewed by Andy <br />Marks regarding the catch basin and water line. Mr. Fudala suggested adding as a condition that, <br />at the entrance of Great Oak Road, the project proponent provide a detail of the area to share <br />with the operations manager and ensure he was happy with the separation of the catch basin and <br />water line. <br />There was no public comment. Mr. Fudala reported that the Certificate of Action had been <br />drafted. The Board considered the waiver request for no sidewalks and no street lighting, <br />although walkways and lighting would be available. A letter was submitted regarding the <br />waivers. The Chair read for the record the waiver request. <br />MOTION: Mr. Kooharian made a motion to approve the two waivers. Mr. Balzarini <br />seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br />Mr. Weeden expressed his preference that the public hearing remain open until the archeological <br />report was reviewed. Mr. Falacci indicated that it was subdivision control. The Chair inquired <br />whether there were any controls in the subdivision regulations should something be discovered <br />in the archeological report, to which Mr. Fudala responded there were no controls in the <br />subdivision regulations. Mr. Rowley indicated that Chapter 38 in State law spoke to <br />archeological studies. Mr. Rowley indicated that any remains found would stop the project while <br />being assessed. The Chair expressed her preference to keep the public hearing open until Mr. <br />Weeden reviewed the report. Mr. Balzarini pointed out that it was unfair to the applicant since <br />the study had already been completed, adding that a tribal member was present for the study and <br />recommended taking a vote. Mr. Fudala agreed that it would exceed the Board's authority <br />within the Subdivision Control Law. <br />MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to close the public hearing. Mr. Kooharian <br />seconded the motion. 3 yes, Z no <br />3 <br />