My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/1984 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
12/19/1984 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 3:34:52 PM
Creation date
1/18/2018 2:58:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> P. O. BOX 1108 <br /> M A H P E E. MA 02649 <br /> PIANNING. BOARD MINUTES : 1 11 1 L� Page 6 <br /> 44 fir. Bowleg said if it 's tied into municipal water supply in future , <br /> they would have supply lines already . He said he 's talking of <br /> " main opposed to " and if going to have main across river, cross <br /> v th larger pipe in that vicinity and narrow. -Pvl # P arsters said <br /> for thea to keep in mind that they design it . <br /> Y5 The Board said they can't consider it an access . There was a <br /> question of fire apparatus get-Ling over it and it looks like 2 <br /> separate sites without a connector. <br /> 6 Atty. Sweeney said it 's being done and will be answered by study. <br /> it <br /> it The Board felt the Dlan was awfully crowded . Mr. Rowley said ad just- <br /> th parking may reduce the number of units . <br /> tt . Swveney said he worked something out with the other side and <br /> they're willing to go the 40' layout , <br /> Atty. Sweeney said the architectural plan originall.y submitted is not the <br /> plan they're following . He said it will be the same foundation plan but <br /> the rest wi11 be different and will look like individual town houses with <br /> units per buildi g. <br /> Mr. Marstcrs made a motion to endorse Mr, owle 's comments in addition <br /> to stating the site is t-oo crowded. Ms . Store said her concern is density <br /> and the Fact it doesn't have to go to the maximum and the impact on the <br /> roads , She said she doesn 't want to deny it at this point but is giving <br /> thea some guidelines . Mr. Rowley sa-id since it 's the westerly side that 's <br /> too crowded , if they adjust the parking and the road and see what it does <br /> to the units on the weterlr side . <br /> -Tr. Dubin said he will write a letter incorporating Mr. owle 's recommenda- <br /> tions <br /> orr enda-- <br /> tions and the recommendations of reduction density. It 's a re c o endat i or <br /> and allows them to go on to the next stage . <br /> At _.!;:Sweeney.-asked t.o be placed on the agenda for January 16, 1985 . <br /> wilr.* Devaney, Steven Doyle and Atty. Gessner submitted an Approval Not <br /> Required for Sarah & Rebecca. Lard Co . for lame on Rte , 151 and James Circle , <br /> Mr. Dubin said it 's a revision of what was turned down at the last meeting . <br /> Atty. G e s n r said he rereviewed the title and found no covenant of record <br /> t the registry of deeds . Mr. Dubin said it thea wasn't approved in accord- <br /> and with the subdivision rules and regulations . <br /> Atty. Gessner said they have done away with 11 lots and would have a loo' <br /> btiffer zone which they will dedicate to the town or conservation commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.