Laserfiche WebLink
11 May 2000 <br /> Page 1s <br /> other plan, even though it is not the most desirable, that could be acceptable. <br /> He asked if Mr. Brabants would be willing to consider that? <br /> Mr. Brabants stated he is willing to give it the two weeks to discuss it. He <br /> hopes that leaving here today, it still is very unspecific and he does not know <br /> how many members of the Board agree or disagree. He is sure most of the <br /> people here are landowners, what are we protecting? If you can say we have <br /> a family of rink that we have documented in there and by your putting your <br /> house there ......Ms Boretos stated she would like to have the ability to make <br /> her recommendation. She stated she thinks that another two weeks would <br /> not be something that is going to cone to some kind of amenable revision for <br /> both parties. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg addressing Ms. Boretos stated he is not taking part in the <br /> hearing but is the Chairman. He stated she may make a recommendation, <br /> unless the applicant requests a continuance. If the applicant requests a <br /> continuance, it can be considered. We cannot continue without the request of <br /> the applicant. if the applicant does not request a continuance, thea the <br /> Agent and Assistant Agent, or any member of the Board, has the right and <br /> the obligation to make either motions or recommendations for motions. That <br /> puts it directly on the applicant and his representative. <br /> Mr. tarot ke stated the applicant clearly did ask for a continuance and has <br /> willingness to explore to see if there is some middle ground that we could <br /> reach. <br /> Ms Boretos stated, for the record, she is happy to do that as she was happy to <br /> meet with the applicant to discuss this very thing last Friday. She would <br /> take objection to having this continuance just be to further along a dialogue <br /> that has already been heard this evening. <br /> The Chair stated the applicant has made a request for a continuance and it is <br /> up to the members of the Board to either accept or deny the request for a <br /> continuance. <br /> notion was made by Greg wirsen to continue at the request of the <br /> applicant for two weeks. He stated revised dans have to be in house five <br /> clays prior to the hearing. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if a different conclusion is reached and they want to <br /> goose a revised plan for consideration at the 251h hearing, we would have to <br />